I just read a story that a man with no legs was arrested for drunken driving. And his best friend is being charged also for operating the gas and the break.......do you think it should be legal to charge 2 men for that crime?
2007-08-30 15:11:48 · 13 answers · asked by Nagitar™ 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
WTF? was he sitting on his buddies lap?lucky he wasn't sited for sodomy...lmao
2007-08-30 15:20:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
conspiracy theory, the person behind the wheel was drunk, he was using his drunk frame of mind to steer the vehicle, the fuel and break man was contributing so he was a part of committing the crime, if he was drunk also then yes they should both be charged with the same crime, if the fuel and break man wasn't drunk, then his charges should be different, like stupidity! why didn't the guy with legs drive, did he not have arms!âº
2007-08-30 22:57:21 · answer #2 · answered by nightmajic~♥~ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose if this is true then yes I guess they could both be charged. If twqo people beat someone up they can BOTH be charged. So I would think the same would apply to driving. If both have a part in it then yes.
2007-08-30 22:33:22 · answer #3 · answered by GRUMPY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-08-30 22:22:20 · answer #4 · answered by Mo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if the pedal guy was drunk yes. But he also could be held responsible for not driving himself instead of risking someone dying.
2007-08-30 22:21:14 · answer #5 · answered by Lt. Shinysides 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I saw it in the NY Post under the column "weird but true"
2007-08-30 22:19:25 · answer #6 · answered by Nick Name 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of you are criminals and don't even know it. It is also illegal to put a squirrel down your pants for the purpose of gambling. I'll be damned.
2007-08-30 22:53:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that doesn't suprise me. in tennessee you will get charged with a DUI for letting someone drive your car when they are drunk. regardless of whether or not you are even with them. rediculous.
2007-08-30 22:19:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes he was an accessory to a crime.
2007-08-30 22:19:57 · answer #9 · answered by seapigsfly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, I bet that is a first for the law books.
2007-08-30 22:17:30 · answer #10 · answered by Kiss my Shaz 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Thought it was strange but drunk is drunk & his friend should know better...what if they had a major accident
2007-08-30 23:23:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋