English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was reading someones question, and they clame that there is evidence for the red sea parting at http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=50. Can you guys tell me if this is actually true or not? Did they find this?

2007-08-30 14:49:30 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

Sorry, no good with rhyming any other clues :)

2007-08-30 16:37:28 · update #1

Thanks for the references about DrDino, i'll keep my eye out next time, lol

2007-08-30 19:48:13 · update #2

I had done a quick look on the net about it. And there's like land bridges and that in the red sea, and a score of other non-religious sites i thought about it. What are your views on these sites? Or do you think they all link from the same apparent evidence by DrDino?

2007-08-30 20:01:51 · update #3

4 answers

drdino.com (also known as Kent Hovind) is a *notoriously* bad source of misinformation and dishonest evidence. Even people like answersingenesis.com (now known as answersincreation.com) have distanced themselves from Hovind (a.k.a. "Dr. Dino"). I would not take *anything* you read on that site seriously.

Do a Google on "Kent Hovind" and you'll learn what you are dealing with. (Or see sources ... these are not 'evolutionist' sites.)

Ron Wyatt is (or was ... he died in 1999) not much better. Wyatt made a name for himself by claiming singlehandedly to have found all the key sites mentioned in the Bible that pilgrims and archaeologists have been searching for for centuries ... Wyatt claims to have found all of them ... from Noah's Ark to the chariots of the drowned Pharaoh's army. Many Christian groups have spoken out against him as a fraud who takes advantage of Christians for money. Kent Hovind, however, still supports his finds. answersingenesis also disavows Ron Wyatt.

2007-08-30 19:41:52 · answer #1 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 0 1

I doubt it. I mean, there are a lot of better reasons than parting seas. And if it happened once, why hasn't it, or any other body of water, parted again?
Never take data and evidence for it's face value. Not for science, religion, politics, and especially Nature. Otherwise we would know a lot more ☺.

2007-08-30 14:59:23 · answer #2 · answered by Mitchell 5 · 0 1

Thats not evidence thats Christian gibberish.. However maybe the red sea did part.. Can you think of a legitimate natural cause that would make a sea split? Hint it ryhmes with ache.

2007-08-30 14:57:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I have not seen what was allegedly discovered, so I can't say. But some of the discoverer's other "finds" (Noah's Ark, e.g.) were so blatantly false that even answersingenesis.org has debunked them. In short, I would seriously doubt the validity of any evidence attributed to Ron Wyatt.

2007-08-30 16:00:18 · answer #4 · answered by injanier 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers