Depends on how much wool would be covering his body. :o)
2007-08-30 14:38:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok, the thought of that is just gross. But if he is covered and you can't really see anything, I guess I would not consider it nudity. EW!!!! Have a good weekend anyways! :)
2007-09-07 20:54:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by BamaBelle810 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and it is unclean and healthy for that that make the body smells worse
2007-09-06 10:56:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by sherrone j 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the Bigfoot guy ran around like that and he never got arrested.
2007-08-30 21:41:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Aiden 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You say..."Damn fool take off that sweater it's Summertime..!!
Naw nudity is fine
2007-08-30 21:39:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pimpstick 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no id consider it time for me to do some body waxing to the extreme!
2007-08-30 21:38:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That is a visual I could go my whole life without wanting to see.
2007-08-30 21:46:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥Instantkarma♥♫ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
An extreme hairy chest is a turn-off for me, but..hey, some dudes are sexy with it.
2007-09-07 19:44:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by PoeticMD 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes because no clothes whither it be a shirt or shorts is nudity.
2007-09-07 21:33:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
???
Only if he wore just the wool suit.
2007-09-07 09:04:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shmooks 7
·
0⤊
0⤋