2007-08-30 14:12:19 · 15 answers · asked by nightmajic~♥~ 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
both, it can see the faults up close with a microscope but chooses to see it through the telescope's eyes, meaning there are faults but there's so much more than meets the eye! so we can just look past them.
2007-08-30 14:18:47 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Microscope.
2007-08-30 17:42:43 · answer #2 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I microscope so u can see the small thing that really count if it was a telescope it would be to small and u woudnt see the stuff that really matter u would only see the out side not what really cout the way way inner person
2007-08-30 14:17:19 · answer #3 · answered by krisia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love exists in mind only-If you telescope or microscope could be that advanced to be considered so -then yes ( you may be surprised to see it's not love but other element!)
2007-08-30 16:45:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At first through a telescope, thereafter, a microscope.
2007-08-30 14:17:32 · answer #5 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes you realise that there's more to the universe and to life than we can see. I've had both a telescope and a microscope and both macro and micro images are fantastic.
2007-08-30 21:15:09 · answer #6 · answered by elflaeda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Usually a microscope, which makes me wonder if it's love at all.
2007-08-31 12:24:11 · answer #7 · answered by tictak kat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a microscope targeted at beautiful eyes
2007-08-30 14:27:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i my case a microscope. but I'm still proud of it
2007-08-30 14:24:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love has no boundrys, it can cross oceans, rivers and plains to find a heart to rest in.
2007-08-30 14:22:24 · answer #10 · answered by ☮ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ ☮ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋