I haven't thought about that devil since his departure. He had as much humanity and love in him as a withered rag.
2007-08-30 13:42:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
What kills me is you have certain people who are conservatives talk about the Democrats, and I see Republicans do the same thing.
Funny how Gingrich can try to impeach a President for cheating on his wife, and he was doing the SAME THING during the impeachment!!!
Hypocrisy is NOT a family value...
EDIT: tx trotter - first of all, Gingrich ADMITTED HE CHEATED ON HIS WIFE, so that is NOT a lie, and you are wrong. Second, "bringing up something old..", if I remember correctly, don't MANY of the conservatives on here AND in the media talk about BILL CLINTON? He's was president HOW LONG AGO?
More hypocrisy...
2007-08-30 20:49:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. Newt Gingrich was dumping his cancer-stricken wife.
Yes. Bill Clinton had an adulterous affair with another consenting adult.
Yes. Larry Craig solicited sex in a public toilet.
Yes. Benjamin Franklin was the consummate ladies' man.
Yes. Tom Foley tried to seduce underage Congressional pages.
Yes. George H.W. Bush had girlfriends.
Yes. John F. Kennedy was a prolific womanizer.
Yes. Dwight Eisenhower had a long-time mistress.
Yes. Ronald Reagan was cheating on his first wife (Jane Wyman) with Nancy, and Nancy was pregnant before she and 'Ronnie' married.
Yes. Frankin Roosevelt had a secret lover.
Yes. Abraham Lincoln had sex with Mary Todd before they were married.
Yes. Jimmy Carter admitted to lusting after women.
Yes. Lyndon Johnson had a gaggle of gals at his disposal whom he treated with utter disresepct.
Yes. George W. Bush was a drunk, a drug abuser, and a bit of a womanizer in college.
Yes. Gary Hart got caught with a woman who wasn't his wife.
Yes. Rush Limbaugh - who demonized drug addicts - is a prescription-pill abuser.
Yes. Gary Condit was having an affair with a young intern who suddenly came up missing.
Yes. Thomas Jefferson fathered a child with one of his black slaves.
Yes. Ted Kennedy was had every intention of having sex instead of driving off a dark and lonely bridge with Mary Jo.
Yes. Rudy Giuliano has been married multiple times, and has had extra-marital affairs.
WILL ALL THE "HOLIER-THAN-THOUS" PLEASE STAND UP AND BE COUNTED? And will all American voters come to the realization that our political leaders are all nothing but a bunch of thugs, wife-beaters, alcoholics,
drug abusers, homosexuals, cross dressers, psychopathic liars, adulterers, bi-sexuals, psychotics, prescription-pill addicts, cheats, war-mongers, power brokers, gamblers, perverts and moral bankrupts?? -RKO- 08/30/07
2007-08-30 21:13:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is that better than driving a car off a bridge drown a woman than not report the accident for 10 hours.
You don't know all of what went on with Newt's life.
I thought the big deal with liberals that you don't want to interfer with private lives.
OOP I keep forgetting 1 rule for liberals another for conservatives.
2007-08-30 20:44:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
I saw Gingrich talk about his "war credentials" the other day on one of the morning talks shows. He said that because he wrote three books about war, he knew what war was like. That guy never ceases to amaze me.
2007-08-30 20:44:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I think the wife thing is worse. In Newt's defense he seems to be a very focused man. He was determined to leave his wife no matter what, and he did it. Way to follow through Newt.
2007-08-30 20:43:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Neither involved official duties, so Clinton's adultery and lying about it both to the public and under oath with a subordinate employee, on govt time/property, for which any private CEO would have been summarily fired, is much worse.
2007-08-30 20:45:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by heart_and_troll 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
I don't see any difference...but it's just been recently that Newt was found out.
2007-08-30 20:44:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Constitution 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Oh wow, now the liberals are resurrecting old, long since proven wrong, stories. This must mean her thighness is on the verge of having to bury another bad piece of news.
2007-08-30 20:42:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
6⤋
probably true. Hey they are both (R), you expect ethics....?
2007-08-30 20:43:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋