English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This would use the "plus one" model, but different than you think. The BCS games would go back to being traditional. Big 10 and Pac 10 in Rose Bowl, exet. The Cotton Bowl would be added to keep the total amount of teams at ten.The winners of the 5 BCS bowl games would have a chance to go to the NC game. An NCAA chosen panel of media people and athletic directors would select two of the five teams to play for the title. I know right now you are saying "Why don't they just have the five teams play each other in a playoff?" Well, the reason is because that isn't going to happen. This is a realistic system that would improve everything. All the BCS games would matter. 10 teams would get a chance to qualify for the championship. Also, all the BCS bowls would be on January first. Could you imagine a day of five bowl games that all matter! That day would be a special spotlight for those five bowls. All other bowls would be moved back one day. A realistic, better system- what do you think?

2007-08-30 13:30:04 · 6 answers · asked by funkydude99@sbcglobal.net 2 in Sports Football (American)

6 answers

they need to do away with the BCS all together because it isn't fair the way it's set up.

You can have undefeated teams in other conferences but will never get a shot at the national title because they aren't in the BCS stable like the Pac 10, ACC, Big 12, SEC etc.

I like the idea of a playoff system with 15 teams (No. 1 would get a bye the first week). Then after all is said and done the last two remaining would play each other in the national championship game.

2007-08-30 13:40:35 · answer #1 · answered by David T 6 · 1 1

good system i say top 16 teams in the country have a play off. NCAA make more cash. Fans see more football. Upsets happen and also champion chips aren't given to 2 teams. 16 isnt too much 1st 16 teams 2nd 8teams 3rd 4 teams 4 Championchip. 4 games isnt too much

2007-08-30 22:05:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The only solution for the BCS is a 16-team playoff.

2007-08-30 20:53:39 · answer #3 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2 0

16 team playoff is too much,,,, use the bowl games as the playoff,,, and have the BCS games as the finals for placements,,,, and give the meaningless bowl games some meaning,,,,,,,

2007-08-30 21:11:30 · answer #4 · answered by rugbydoc_1999 3 · 0 3

hmmm... your way seems to make sense...and hell its gotta be better than what it is now! :-)

2007-08-30 22:04:26 · answer #5 · answered by TheBostonBuckeye 5 · 0 0

sounds good to me.

2007-08-30 20:40:53 · answer #6 · answered by Matt G 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers