English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Thanks, your answers are always appreciated!

2007-08-30 12:27:02 · 11 answers · asked by Lucifer Sam 5 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

Well, percdisco has a bit of a point there, but Disco was pretty short lived; it was around for 7-10 years. In 1967, however, The Beatles were reaching their peak, Cream's Disreali Gears and Pink Floyd's Piper at the Gates of Dawn were both released. So were a lot of great guitar albums, and there was really a cultural revolution in this time period too. With that in mind, what's your opinion?

2007-08-30 12:41:38 · update #1

11 answers

100%agree with u..cause i think tht time,ppl care about music more than female singers butt and boobs..these female pop singers,and stupid bands like westlife,bstreet boys etc ruin music.

2007-08-30 12:35:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Hi Britcop Jim,

That's good music to you because you were alive around that time. There was plenty of good music that came out way before that time, but you had to be born in that era to appreciate it.

A lot of people love jazz, blues, and the big band sound. Some people love classical music which, really, all of this modern music is based upon. So I guess that it's all in the eye of the beholder.

Have a great weekend.

--Rick

2007-08-31 03:34:27 · answer #2 · answered by rickrudge 6 · 0 0

Signing and promoting too many acts instead of being more selective. The talent is out there. The problem is development of talent.

2007-08-30 12:31:45 · answer #3 · answered by Galahad 7 · 0 1

the blue album- weezer
released: may 10 1994

2007-08-30 12:30:29 · answer #4 · answered by mclovin 6 · 1 1

People were creative and had ideas to express. The social movements going on in the times ect..

2007-08-30 12:30:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Huh? Depends on what generation appreciates it.

2007-08-30 12:31:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

because the songs werent all about the same thing!

2007-08-30 12:32:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The artists' had more depth back then!

2007-08-30 12:32:18 · answer #8 · answered by Oh, it's like that? 7 · 2 0

thats a contradiction. 2 points for me.

2007-08-30 12:30:40 · answer #9 · answered by Bradley 5 · 0 2

it was wasn't it. Weren't we lucky, we even survived disco.

2007-08-30 12:35:54 · answer #10 · answered by percsdisco 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers