It's been found that Iraq has hit 3 of 18 benchmarks set by THE WHITE HOUSE, now tony snow is going on about how benchmarks are not the only way to measure results... If there was another way to do it, why didn't the white house include it in the benchmarks.... Doesn't it tell you something when the people who set the benchmarks say they don't matter? If you still support the war in Iraq, how can you look at this and not be angry?
Please don't tell me anything about them "following us home" I might believe it if the people that made this prediction had predicted even one thing right in the entire Iraqi war, but they haven't so that argument holds no water.
2007-08-30
11:08:31
·
8 answers
·
asked by
crushinator01
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
rerugged, apparently I'm speaking above you're head, the white house is an allegory for the current administration, always has been, also you're wrong, the benchmarks were set by the white house and congress, look at them, they are not arbitrary, they make sense.... It's just sad that someone like you could be so blind, and so complacent in being so blind. just making things up.
2007-08-30
11:24:33 ·
update #1