maybe its not such a good idea for him to do that you think
2007-08-30 10:30:41 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
what a idiot. george washington shoulda invaded irak an takin all that oil.
2007-08-30 10:35:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because Washington knew the Liberals would encourage war, but then they would surrender and support Iraq.
Some things just never change.
2007-08-30 10:41:04 · answer #2 · answered by wolf 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because "iraq" did not exist in 1792.
2007-08-30 10:43:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They weren't WMD's in those days. They were FMD's: Flintlocks of Moderate Destruction.
2007-08-30 10:40:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, Iraq wasn't a country yet. Shouldn't you have known this Sparticus?
2007-08-30 10:56:40 · answer #5 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey GENIUS...pray tell what was a wmd in 1792? without that info your question cant be answered
GET A LIFE LIBERAL.
2007-08-30 10:40:39 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ah try reality sometime I am sure you will like it.
2007-08-30 10:36:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
??????? huh ???????
2007-08-30 10:37:42 · answer #8 · answered by cadisneygirl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋