I've read some things about this theory on the web, but now I'm curious about your personal opinion/thoughts on that. Are there real arguments for that or is it only a startler story of some people who wanted to be famous by inventing that? What do you think?
Thanks for the answers, in advance.
mira
2007-08-30 09:29:18 · 0 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
no, it is a silly idea, easily disproven. To have "fabricated" three centuries would have required a concerted effort by a variety of governments, chroniclers and religious leaders in three rival "empires", working together for no discernable purpose.
Aside from that, dendochronology leaves no space for a three-century gap.
2007-08-30 10:07:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The vast majority of historians believe this theory to be incorrect and they are correct.
2007-08-30 10:06:01 · answer #2 · answered by Randy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋