Norman Hso has been a fugitive from justice since 1991 in Calf. He's been supporting the Clinton's and other democrats illegally for years ,making hugh donations thur friends and business associates.Now that the media gives the story the cover-up begins. Hillary says she didn't know so she will give some of the illegal funds to charity,why not all of it?Politics as usual!
2007-08-30 08:07:28 · 12 answers · asked by Dragons Slayer 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They and their staffs knew it and the Clinton's have been involved in this funding source from other Chinese who have proven to be agents for China with motives not in the US interests if you look back to the funding Clinton and Gore went for during their administration.
2007-08-30 08:16:49 · answer #1 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Your kinda stretching the truth there a bit aren't you?? He has been contributing to the Democratic Party since 2004...not for years and years. And would you feel the same way if this was a Republican candidate being supported and receiving the donation? And for Mr. Hso being a fugitive for years...I'd look to the prosecutor in the case for not being diligent in performing his duties because Mr. Hso has been in the public on several several occasions...it's not like he was in hiding or that he was out of the country (as this prosecutor 'assumed') - get off your high horse before another Republican candidate gets tied up in the same fiasco and you have to backtrack through all of that sh*t you are dumping.
2007-08-30 16:55:13 · answer #2 · answered by Becca 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you seriously believe that in large political campaigns with hundreds or thousands of workers in many areas of the state or country that the candidate has their pulse on every single penny collected? They have people to take care of that stuff for them. Some laws are foggy with regard to campaign contributions. Don't tell me that GOPAC has been totally above board on accepting donations either. If an when a candidate finds out about illigal contributions they order their people to return them immediately which, was done by both Shumer and Clinton. This is kind of old news isn't it?
2007-08-30 15:36:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You say yourself the donation was funneled through friends and business associates - how would the campaign know that it came from another source?
Now it is identified the campaign is getting rid of ALL the money.
Not a story, except for liars trying to manufacture spin.
2007-08-30 15:44:58 · answer #4 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because the love of money is the root of all evil.
From Watergate to Gonzogate, from Vietnam to Iraq, it shows the trump of wanting more money and more power.
We as American people do not stand up to this evil because we are too busy pursuing the dollar ourselves.
You reap what you sow.
2007-08-30 15:18:02 · answer #5 · answered by hello T 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Noman was illegally contributing to them? hmmm... sounds like No-man... is this another trick by the wily Odysseus?
2007-08-30 15:20:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's a big donor to her campaign, responsible for over $1 million. She knows.
One other thing----he's Chinese. Bring back memories of the 1996 Clinton campaign?
2007-08-30 15:17:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Did they give all the money back?
No, so there is your answer. She knew and she feels the American people are too stupid to remember this come election time.
2007-08-30 15:42:45 · answer #8 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
actually, she said that she will be giving ALL of it to charity. if you can't even get a simple news story right, how do you expect a politician to know if every penny that gets contributed to their campaign is legal/legit?
she did the right thing after she found out the money was tainted. what more do you want, blood?
2007-08-30 15:16:24 · answer #9 · answered by Free Radical 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
i have sure noticed, the democrats sure seem to have to return campaign donations from criminals, alot more than republicans do.
It's like a weekly occurance with them.
2007-08-30 15:37:05 · answer #10 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋