English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Those places are worse than some war zones...it certainly couldn't hurt to implement a change...The Democrats are for less changes in these places than Republicans...Not very "progressive" of the Dems is it?

2007-08-30 07:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2 2

I think it's nonsense that the degree of crime in any city is proportional to the politics of the city. There are plenty of big cities with high crime rates that lean towards either party. Crime in a city is generally directly proportional to the economy of a city. Crime usually increases when unemployment increases. Look at big cities that are primarily Democrat or primarily Republican. You will find crime-laden cities on both sides of the aisle and a great deal of it is because jobs that once supported those cities have been shipped out to third world countries, regardless of the will of the people.

2007-08-30 07:19:55 · answer #2 · answered by eddie j 2 · 1 0

No,
Both the Democratic and Republican parties are controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Same crap, different pile. Ever since Colonel Mandell House founded the CFR, America has been on a steady journey towards socialism.
When is the last time you heard a liberal or a neocon expose the CFR? Probably never. I'ts not on Murdock's agenda.

Mainstream media political debate is just a smokescreen for the real powerbrokers. While we get riled up in political debate, they stab us in the back and take more and more away from us until we are their economic slaves.

2007-08-30 07:04:23 · answer #3 · answered by ReefLobster 2 · 1 2

Since nether have done anything in the past You have to judge who voted for the amnesty bill & at this point who is try to fight crime an who is defending the criminals>>?I guess the REP are doing more>>?An Bush isn't running again so he is irrevelent>>?

2007-08-30 07:24:16 · answer #4 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0 1

Yes. I am from Newark, NJ, a Democrat's paradise and the city is ripe with crime.

2007-08-30 07:08:39 · answer #5 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 0 1

They need to stop blaming "loose" gun laws in states 200 miles away from the violence, especially since, if the "looseness" of those states' laws were the source of the violence, those states would have even higher crime rates, which they don't.

I'm so sick of Tom Menino doing ZERO and blaming the NRA and Vermont's so-called "loose" gun laws - - - if that were true there'd be a crime wave in Vermont (I mean apart from the rebel nudists) that would have SPREAD to Mission Hill.

But that's not the case.

That means the theory is FOS.

Who exactly voted thumbs down on this? Blaming inanimate objects being sold 200 miles away for crimes occurring in your city that aren't occurring near where those objects were sold MAKES ZERO SENSE.

That's really not a point on which rational minds can differ!!!!

SO-CALLED "LOOSE" GUN LAWS IN VERMONT ARE NOT THE CAUSE OF GANG MURDERS IN MISSION HILL!

2007-08-30 07:00:52 · answer #6 · answered by truthisback 3 · 6 4

Rudy did some incredible things with New York. You're more likely to be killed in the democratic strong hold of Washington D.C. than in Iraq. Do we see a trend?

2007-08-30 07:02:04 · answer #7 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 4 3

You have got to be kidding , the Republican rating is 0. By, the way what happened to that September report that all the Republican told us, just wait until Patreaus sends in his September Report, what another lie. There is no report just another Republican lie.

2007-08-30 07:01:24 · answer #8 · answered by Nicki 6 · 3 3

Yea, they should vote in people who care even less about what happens to them. That'll work.

2007-08-30 07:09:56 · answer #9 · answered by DeAnna 4 · 1 1

You mean cities like New York, who elected Rudy and then saw crime drop? Sounds good to me!

2007-08-30 07:00:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8 3

fedest.com, questions and answers