Most likey. But SOMEONE was behind the controlled demolition of those buildings.
Thanks for the question and ignore the uneducated people that insult people with the common sense to question what people tell them when something does not seem right.
You are very smart.
2007-08-30 06:29:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
9⤋
lol-No!
How come nobody ever assumes it could have been a very furious and angry Al Gore exacting his revenge by planning strikes on the businessmen and women in the World Trade Centers who would not have voted for him, and the people in the Pentagon who would not have voted for him either, and finally against the White House and Bush for having won the 2000 election.
I mean the motive is right there! PLUS. . . He was in New York "teaching" at Columbia at the time!
Seriously, though, the report in Popular Mechanics is a very good explanation of how WTC 7 fell. But I guess people like you have to learn to read first. . .
2007-08-30 13:31:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
What, pray tell, would be the purpose of demolishing WTC7? Did the government conspirators think that all the lives lost in the first two towers, the pentagon, and flight 93 wouldn't be enough? That the barely noticed collapse of an unoccupied, relatively unknown building would be the final straw in cowing the public?
2007-08-30 14:06:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brian A 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Since the towers fell as a result of the impact of two airliners, no.
Building 7 fell down as a direct result of heavy damage to its structure suffered by the collapse of the twin towers. Several other buildings in the immediate vicinity also suffered severe structural damage and have had to be demolished as a result.
Reality is a nice place to live. You should visit us sometime.
2007-08-30 13:33:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by thegubmint 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
Another Conspiracy theorist.....ughhhhh!!!!please quit misusing google and go to your local library and read the popular mechanic's issue on the WTC catastrophe, it was researched by reputable structural, metallurgic and civic engineers. It also gives you plenty of reliable sources for futher reading.
2007-08-30 13:48:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by TranquilStar 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
You must be a product of the public school system, because you have been woefully denied a proper education of even basic physical science, much less American Civics and US History.
2007-08-30 13:41:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by julie m 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
I hear the black helicopters coming and the kool aide is ready for your consumption. The History Channel exposed your lies
2007-08-30 13:46:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
People who cite Popular Mechanics for debunking are absolute idiots!!! who have done no research, David Ray Griffins book Debunking 911 Debunking absolutely slaughters everything PM has to offer, keep doing your own research.
2007-08-30 14:57:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by wtfsept11 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
The drugs are rotting your brain. The Death Star being destroyed was an inside job-think about long and hard and get back with me.
2007-08-30 13:28:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
2⤋
Yes, and the culprits are hiding in Area 51.
2007-08-30 13:28:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Hmmm...
Since there wasn't any "controlled demolition" of the WTC buildings, I would have to say, "No."
2007-08-30 13:36:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋