By all accounts, Leslie Van Houten has been a perfect inmate while in prison since the early 1970s. She renounced Charles Manson long, long ago. At about the age of 60, she is not seen as a danger to anyone. She is in prison for murder, but she has shown remorse, and taken every opportunity to improve herself as a human being.
Should she be released?
2007-08-30 05:49:45 · 13 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No, she should continue to rot.
2007-08-30 05:56:57 · answer #1 · answered by JN 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes Leslie should be paroled she is not a danger to society she was under the influence of drugs and charlie and was brainwashed. She has turned her life around and has many job offers and places to live. Leslie was not involved with the Sharon Tate murders , I wish people would get their stories straight.
2007-08-30 11:50:36 · answer #2 · answered by Kimo 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I consulted my OUIJA BOARD, and Sharon says "SCREW THAT". Such a cold blooded killer could never be trusted. To follow someone like Chuckie boy, and do the things they did, you would be a fool to cut any of them loose. She will always be a burden on the taxpayers, whether on SS or in prison. Personally, I'd prefer to pay the extra dollar to keep her where she belongs. How many chances do serial killers get in your world? She's already had more than her share.
2007-08-30 06:15:57 · answer #3 · answered by pappyld04 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
NO. All the remorse in the world isn't going to bring back Sharon Tate or her precious unborn child.
2007-08-30 05:57:15 · answer #4 · answered by AsianPersuasion :) 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Only if you are willing to take her into your home and have her live with your family. We can put her under house arrest at your place.
2007-08-30 05:55:38 · answer #5 · answered by Dude 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No she shouldnt be released. I would not feel safer with her on the streets!
2007-08-30 06:03:40 · answer #6 · answered by <Carol> 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am not sure of her mental state. If she is still not stable then no.
2007-08-30 05:58:28 · answer #7 · answered by Question Addict 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
she should of been shot back then and there would be no question about it now and alot of money saved in between
2007-08-30 06:12:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sharron Tate says, No........
2007-08-30 06:06:46 · answer #9 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
no. the people they killed aren't getting a 2nd chance.
2007-08-30 05:55:50 · answer #10 · answered by civil_av8r 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋