edwards or obama. a lot of the best minds in the united states are backing obama. economists like him because he is the one with the most substantial economic program. reversing the direction the economic trends this country is moving in seems like a major task but he has people that have figured out how to reverse run away money printing, debt and inflation. his biggest problem would be dealing with congress to get anything through. i think working with congress would be anyones problem -- its been broken for a long long time. you can't have an active democracy with just two parties.
mostly we need a government that functions and one person can't do that by themselves. and expecting a congress made up of people so immoral they try to get sex in airport bathrooms while they oppose gay rights and well um -- i am digressing. the gop might not be grand anymore but it is still old. its kind of fun watching them run like the cartoon bugs in raid commericals. who knew you can move that fast in your senior years. their congressional record doesn't show that much activity unless its just to screw the other guy. do you have any idea how much of congresses time is wasted in just making sure the other sides agenda doesn't make it to the floor?
2007-08-30 04:54:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
First of all, all 3 applicants mentioned they could be the quality. So you need to query the judgment of 2 of them. Also marvel for those who made a Freudian assertion alternatively of a query in wording your query. Of the nine principal disorders, the one predicament that there was once a change among the applicants and McCain was once Obama had more potent gun manage disorders than Clinton or Edwards. A withdrawal date is claimed to be an predicament by means of all 3, however now not McCain. Otherwise all of them gave the impression identical. So, I could say who ever will have to be the Democrat's predicament chief could have the quality hazard. Not that I assume the election to be found by means of some thing as non-first as disorders.
2016-09-05 18:21:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by elzey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trying to be funny are you! It's which. Barack Obama because he is the most honest and smart enough to have known that we shouldn't have invaded Iraq in the first place. Colin Powell tried to warn Bush, but he wouldn't listen. Also, Obama hasn't been in DC long enough to be corrupted. And he's extremely intelligent. Check out BarackObama.com. I'll take good judgement over experience any day of the week. And by the way, it may take a witch doctor to straighten out the mess Bush is leaving.
2007-08-30 04:38:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I was talking to my Grandmother a while ago and she came up with a wonderful thing Obama could do...but before that ill answer ur question, Hilary Clinton because she has alot more xp not mention her husband is one of the most beloved presidents, and im sure alot of ppl would love to see him in office again, you know? but now..what i was saying, i think Obama should run for vice president for the simple fact that this will give him the xp and he will be fit on Hilary's side i mean cmon why run against each other and more than likely lose and instead of joining forces? it makes perfect sense and then maybe when Hilary is out of office then he'll be ready, but yea Hilary has 2008 wrapped up
2007-08-30 04:45:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
I do not believe there is a good candidate. They seem like paper dolls to me. Say and do the same thing, as long as they bash Bush while doing it. Why are they running against Bush? He isn't running. Tell me what you are going to do, not what Bush has done wrong. We already know that.
2007-08-30 04:38:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by BL1957 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
No democratic candidate could possibly be the best. The democrats have turned into an anti-American group of imbeciles promoting socialism.
2007-08-30 04:42:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
I don't know WHICH one is the best since I won't be voting for a democrat but Hillary is definitely the WITCH.
2007-08-30 04:38:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
None of them are really all that GOOD, but I think I'd prefer to see Hillary Clinton than anyone else. She seems to be smarter and more innovative, less run-of-the-mill than the others so to speak. And if there's one thing America needs, it's a change from the status quo...right now, things are not really working that well.
2007-08-30 04:40:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
was that deliberate, to use the word "witch" not once but twice? A freudian slip? Subliminal messages?
Hmmm...
2007-08-30 04:39:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes, some do think Hillary is a "witch." Perhaps you mean "which?"
2007-08-30 05:12:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋