The newspapers are slanted to the left, they want Dems to win elections so they can destroy capitalism and replace it with socialism. Therefore, they need to make Dems look as positive as possible - even if it's a stinking lie - and vilify Reps as much as possible - even if it's a stinking lie.
The MSM is not a news source in America, it is propaganda agency for the Democrat party.
2007-08-30 02:39:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I haven't heard much about the illegal campaign funds. I doubt that the candidates handle their own campaign donations and depend on their aides to take care of that.
The fact that Castro, Chavez, and other leaders who despise the Bush administration is really no surprise. They would like to be members of the world trade community just like China is, but they can't under this administration.
2007-08-30 09:27:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rumsfeld was recommended for hanging because he shook hands with Sadamm.
Clinton shook hands with Fidel but it took the BBC to even notice. Rueters grabbed it too but, I can't find one US periodical who cared.
Clinton found himself on the same side as Castro in the Elian Gonzales case and Adolf Reno sent in the storm troopers.
Now Castro says Hillary is 'Invincible'.
I'm not sure I can used to calling my buddies comrade.
Hillary in the White House = JimSock in Costa Rica
EDIT:
BTW Bill denied that the hand shake took place at frist but, yep, you guessed it, he was lying. Seems to be an auto response for the whole household.
2007-08-30 09:31:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dems caught with illegal campaign funds... which they immediately donated to charity upon discovering that they were illegal funds.
Castro endorses Clinton... well, not really; he said he thought she was likely to win. Even so, are you recommending that American citizens cast their vote based on something that FIDEL CASTRO said?
Because, personally, I don't care WHO Fidel Castro wants as President of the U.S. Why do you need a communist dictator of another country to tell you who to vote for?
2007-08-30 09:25:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why would anyone be outrages by what an old dictator says, and, who in their right mind would endorse another Republican for President, given the disasterous consequences of the Bush Presidency?
2007-08-30 09:31:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by alphabetsoup2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton will give to charity the $23,000 in donations she has received from a fundraiser who is wanted in California for failing to appear for sentencing on a 1991 grand theft charge.
.
2007-08-30 09:24:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The campaign fund story will break big-time,but any idiot who thinks anything Castro has had to say about the United States since the fall of the Soviet Union is just that,an idiot.
2007-08-30 09:22:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Can you say nail in the coffin? The way this is spreading over the Internet and talk radio it's only a matter of time before the commie, oops I mean Hilly has to defend the endorsement.
2007-08-30 09:23:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I guess so. I barely heard the coverage about Castro endorsing Clinton. If it had been a republican it would have been all over the news.
2007-08-30 09:22:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ItsJustMe 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
a) Clinton gave the money to charity
b) why would you care whom Fidel endorses, is he you leader/political adviser ?
2007-08-30 09:24:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋