yeah....if you believe this, I have some swamp land to sell you. That money will be back in her accounts in no time. That I will guarantee.
2007-08-30 02:22:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Uh, excuse me.
Aren't the Clintons the same people who gave the Chinese top secret guided missile technology in return for a half million bucks in campaign contributions, allowing the Chinese the technology to take out our military and communications satellites any time they want to?
Aren't the Clintons the same people who pardoned, among others, Marc Rich in return for $250,000 in donations from Rich's Wife Denise?
Aren't the Clintons the same people who looted the White House of linens, china and silverware on their way out the door?
Aren't the Clintons the same people who looted Air Force One?
Aren't the Clintons the same people who brought you Monicagate, Paulagate, Gennifergate, Vince Foster, Mike Espey............
And On, And on, And on
And you want these people back in the White House. Those who don't learn from their mistakes are doomed to repeat them.
2007-08-30 09:32:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yep. This is standard accepted practice when a candidate learns that campaign funds had been obtained illegally. There was a news story last year about a Republican candidate this happened to, and he did the same thing. But that wasn't an issue, because he wasn't married to Bill Clinton.
2007-08-30 09:32:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Nope, I think it's the, "Oh s**t, I got caught! Better do something with these illegal contributions!". You think we need another Clinton in the white house?! Lol!
2007-08-30 09:23:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Would any of them have given up this money if they had not been caught?
Honesty? Give us a break!
2007-08-30 09:25:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by oldsalt 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
the only reason they're giving it away is because they got caught with it. she's been taking money from him since at least 2004.
2007-08-30 09:25:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by civil_av8r 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
She shouldn't have accepted the 1 Million $ in the first place.
She got caught and now she decides to donate, would she if she wasn't?
2007-08-30 09:22:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Edge Caliber 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Definitely... honesty may not be the best policy, but it sure beats "you're with us or against us"
2007-08-30 09:23:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tweet 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Obama doesn't look so bad...
2007-08-30 09:25:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
ROFLMAO !! ............ and you can`t see this for what it is ? A carefully planned scenario that shows us how "good" , "kind" , "concerned" , "loving" , and "humanitarian" our girl Hillary REALLY is .
LOL ........ LOL ......... LOL ......... LOL ......... LOL .....................
2007-08-30 09:28:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋