Isn't it funny when someone comes up with a theory, they get insulted because it suggests that Maybe the parents had a hand in all of this?
You have asked a very good question. It's obvious that the friends and the parents versions of events vary on a daily basis, so they cannot be seen as reliable witnesses. So yes, I agree wirh you, who was the member of public (unrelated to the McCann's) who saw this child for the last time?
2007-08-30 00:05:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by MissEssex 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
James M, They are not TRYING to HELP
This is another nasty cruel question and here is the reason for it:
To any new readers of the hate campaign the "questions" number 1000s , estimated as over 2550, with an estimated 30,000 mostly nasty answers.This question is asked to attract answers from people who enjoy hatred
To understand this phenomenon you must realise that some people are "getting off" with news about the child, also they gain a similar pleasure in slagging off the exhausted and heroic parents.
This is all about weirdos enjoyment of hate caused by jealousy. The McCanns are sophisticated and professional people, ideal targets for the jealousy/ hate mob.
The McCanns are innocent people who turned their backs for minutes and their dear child was gone. Now goons drool over their misfortune. Of course the McCanns will not read the garbage written about them in Yahoo answers
2007-08-30 09:36:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with stripper. Also I don't think the blood on the walls will be found to be Maddy's .I think the police are more interested in the results of the other items being tested in Birmingham. The findings of the cadaver dog are more important than the blood.
2007-08-30 00:51:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by little weed 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Its a good question - but I hhave seen no source that answers that one. Which is isnt really much of an answer I suppose.
Prepare though for the Pro-McCann morons to have this question taken off (reported) as it hurts their sensitivities.
2007-08-30 08:28:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by 17pdr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok Kojak, you've got to give this a rest. Why are the police force crying out for staff when there are qualified over night detectives on here worthy of the jobs?
Stop speculating for the attention.
2007-08-30 02:21:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tabbyfur aka patchy puss 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have always maintained and still stand by my opinion that I think her parents know what has happened to her. There is simply not something quite right about either of them.
2007-08-30 00:36:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Stripper 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
It is very hard to say when the story keep changing a lot. Best left to the ones investigating this.
2007-08-29 21:17:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
The blood does not belong to Madeleine does it?
When that does become a hard fact, will the accidental death supposably by her parents and all the speculation come to rest. I hope so.
2007-08-29 21:16:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by LEXY 4
·
1⤊
7⤋
Maybe Madeleine fell off the bed trying to reach cuddlecat on the top shelf
EDIT:
Jack: Thanks for the points x
2007-08-29 22:27:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
There was no blood belonging to her in the apartment. The blood was not hers. Once again - THE BLOOD WAS NOT HERS. How many times does it need saying before people get it into their dense noggins?
2007-08-29 21:18:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Noodle 3
·
1⤊
6⤋