English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think he is gearing that way. 1-20-09 can't come quick enough for me. This administration is criminal.

2007-08-29 17:15:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

www.zeitgeistmovie.com

If you have two hours to spare, I would recommend watching this movie. Very interesting to say the least.

2007-08-29 17:16:52 · update #1

9 answers

After hearing the same question many times it has gotten quite boring.

2007-08-30 01:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 0 0

Ron Paul: Iran Attack On Within A Year
Presidential candidate says Neo-Cons waiting for right opportunity
Prison Planet | August 28, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson

Presidential candidate Ron Paul believes that an attack on Iran is highly likely within a year and that the Bush administration is simply waiting for the right opportunity, or event on which to blame Iran, before launching the assault.

"If I were a betting man I would bet that they will attack Iran before the end of this administration, which means in the next year or so," the Congressman told the Alex Jones Show today.


"The plans have been laid just like the plans were laid to go into Iraq a long time before they did but they had to wait for the right opportunity."

"The radical Neo-Cons are still there - they may have been diminished a little bit but they're still very very influential and very very powerful and they have the President's ear so I think they're just laying the plans, waiting for the opportunity," said Paul.

" I don't think the opportunity presents itself right now, I don't think we're gonna wake up tomorrow morning and have it happen unless they can blame the Iranians for something else - of course they're setting the stage for that by declaring that their Guard unit over there is a terrorist organization, so anything now is possible and they'll blame it on the Iranians and and make that excuse."

The Presidential candidate said he had "Talked to some military people and historians who knew the region," and they they told him "it would be the most disastrous thing we could do for our own sake," jeopardizing the lives of U.S. troops in Iraq and trapping them from getting out of the Persian Gulf.

Rhetoric regarding a potential military attack on Iran has heated again over the past few days, and President Bush himself stoked the flames further today when he warned of the risk of a "nuclear holocaust" if the country was allowed to acquire nuclear capability.

In a speech Monday , French President Nicolas Sarkozy said that a diplomatic push by the world's powers to rein in Tehran's nuclear program was the only alternative to "an Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran."

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today stated that a U.S. attack on Iran was "impossible" due to U.S. troops being tied down in Afghanistan and Iraq. He also dismissed Sarkozy's warning , calling the French premiere "inexperienced" and labeling his comments as purely "for the consumption of his inner circles."

2007-08-30 00:35:42 · answer #2 · answered by haywood jablome 4 · 2 1

Well since Bush has never used military force without Congressional consent.

I doubt it.

Bush, unlike the previous president who used the military in Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti, kosavo and Sudan without Congressional consent or approval

Seems to obey the law on getting approval from congress first.

2007-08-30 00:26:23 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1 1

george bush will make reasons up just like when he said they have weapons of mass destruction.then oops they don't sorry lets have a war.yea bush makes up the rules as he goes.and yes everything bad including dust in my house is his fault.

2007-08-30 02:02:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, but Iran sure is trying to find one. And they will get it at the eleventh hour.

2007-09-01 14:03:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You have the shoes on the wrong feet.

Iran is the provocateur.
Iran continues its nuclear weapons program and its threats to wipe out Israel

Iran is the country that kidnapped our embassy workers and held them for 444 days. Their president was there.

Iran is the country that waged a nine year war with Iraq that killed a million people.

Iran is the insane theocracy that still stones people to death and hangs teenagers for being gay.

What you understand would fit in a thimble.

2007-08-30 00:22:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I wonder if he fact that Iran is publicly acknowledging that they are building nukes is part of the Presidents super duper secret plan to protect the country.

Man that is criminal.

2007-08-30 00:19:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

no but we should bomb Iran and Syria nukes and terrorist camps

2007-09-02 21:06:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, I think the Iranians will create the reason.

2007-08-30 00:18:16 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 4 3

hmmmm. everything negative on this planet can someway be attributed to Bush.
I saw bugs outside and spiders. thats president Bush's fault
I had dust in my house too. I think thats Bush's fault too'

2007-08-30 00:19:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

fedest.com, questions and answers