Do you really think that we can be invaded by terrorists? You do realize that is the scenario you are describing, right? If that happened, which it won't, I would fight to save our way of life.The only irony is that you, who would rather sacrifice someone else to save your sorry butt, would be the one joining the ranks of the terrorists, and lopping the heads off of the Liberal resistance.
2007-08-29 16:22:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Americans, liberal and conservative, were united in support of going into Afghanistan and taking down Taliban, AlQuaeda, and capturing or killing Osama bin Laden after 911. It was only after giving up on Osama and getting involved in a poorly implemented war in some place that had nothing to do with 911, based on lies and faulty intelligence that reasonable people objected.
2007-08-30 00:38:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh. I get it now. The US is at war to fight Islam. And they are coming to America to lop off American heads.
I was waiting for a really good reason to explain the 3738 deaths of US soldiers. I'll let my USAF son know.
2007-08-29 23:28:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by LBee 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Liberal does not equal push over. When there is reason to fight, liberals don't take shi*. But when some backwards prick from the south wants to create a war to take american lives and waste taxpayer money over nothing but his own (and his buddies') profits, they have to protest. Blind faith in america is something that has to go. America doesn't care about you. At all. Keep paying your taxes for nothing.
2007-08-29 23:22:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ryan 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Sounds like you are real eager to join up with the Islamists...
2007-08-29 23:24:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Real irony is you use big fat 'WHITE ELEPHANT" for avatar. Cheer up punkster...not all people ignorant.
2007-09-02 10:25:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by lo Fat 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Put your panties back on Gertrude.
Islam is not a threat to America. That was just a lie Bush told you so he could start his war for Halliburton.
2007-08-29 23:19:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by cons_are_cowards 2
·
5⤊
3⤋
Oh, plus there the ones campaigning putting a US l;ed peacekeeping force in Darfur. Hypocrits.
2007-08-29 23:19:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
The liberals obviously do not take possible consequences of their policies or agendas seriously, if at all.
Getting their "heads lopped off" isn't even a factor in their thought process - avoiding all confrontation at all costs regardless of the provocation or possible outcomes.
2007-08-29 23:26:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
8⤋
i never thought a fat elephant could ask a legitimate question...heres some penits for you.... lard ast
2007-08-29 23:21:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋