English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Absolutely!

qwid_pro_quo: Mark Foley was just "1 man". Ted Haggard was just "1 man". David Vitter was just "1 man". Larry Craig was just "1 man".

Put them all together and it begins to add up to a lot more than just "1 man".
.

2007-08-29 14:43:00 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1 1

i'm not conservative and that i don't view abortion as homicide. on the different hand, there's a element interior the slogan "weapons do not kill human beings; human beings kill human beings". that announcing ignores the shown fact that a gun is a facilitator, making it particularly undemanding for a guy or woman to kill somebody (some could say "too undemanding"), besides the shown fact that, yet there is distinctive certainty in it. To me, the gun-administration undertaking is in basic terms a query of degree; of "the place will we draw the line?". many things could be used as weapons to kill human beings. Few human beings could recommend outlawing kitchen knives for this reason and few human beings have faith that inner maximum electorate could be allowed to very own floor-to-air missiles, however the line ought to be drawn someplace between those 2. it style of feels like distinctive human beings on the two facets of the gun-administration undertaking leave out that element, seeing it rather as a black-and-white undertaking. for many human beings, there's a similar gray section whilst it includes abortion, having to do with whilst a fetus could be considered as an self sustaining person and not portion of the mum's physique. For persons, besides the shown fact that, because of the fact of religious ideals (as an occasion) it particularly is black and white - as quickly as there's a fertilized egg, there's someone. to that end, in case you injury it, you're committing homicide.

2016-11-13 19:55:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually it is an example of the hypocrisy of politics in general.

The Democratic party has several members that were convicted of similar or worse sexually motivated crimes that were not asked to leave office or resign from their posts.

2007-08-29 15:56:47 · answer #3 · answered by Albert F 5 · 0 1

Only if he gets away with it. If he is forced to resign, then no, because the values of the party forces someone who doesn't represent those values out. Unlike Democrats who just turn their faces away and pretend it didn't happen.

2007-08-29 14:44:08 · answer #4 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0 1

Absolutely.

2007-08-29 14:38:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

YES!!!!! and he won't be the last. they are all lying scum. remember that old message they all tried to put over on us? "FAMILY VALUES" and OH remember when BUSH took office first time "I'm bringing MORALITY back to the white house".

2007-08-29 14:40:51 · answer #6 · answered by politicallypuzzeled 3 · 2 1

politicians

2007-08-29 14:40:41 · answer #7 · answered by siaosi 5 · 0 0

no .. he was 1 man

2007-08-29 14:38:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

yep

2007-08-29 14:41:34 · answer #9 · answered by mr_fartson 7 · 2 1

No.

2007-08-29 14:38:50 · answer #10 · answered by American Sunshine 3 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers