Most Catholics do not believe in a literal translation of the Bible.
The pope believes in evolution, with God creating the universe and letting creation unfold for mankind.
Catholic universities are world famous for research into the fundamental structures and explanations of the universe. Vatican astronomers have faith and follow scientific method and logic.
Catholic ideology has not been literal for centuries.
Sorry. Evolution is science. Science runs your car, your computer and the drugs that cure your ailments. You can not pick and choose. Science is real.
God is myth.
2007-08-31 06:18:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by aka DarthDad 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolution is going on around us every single day. More than 5000 species a day become extinct as they can no longer survive and around the same number of species that are discovered daily are documented as well. The bible is a wonderful book to live by, but some of the stories have deeper meanings and have alter meanings than just the way it reads. I would suggest that you stop taking the bible for face value and look behind the words... be a real catholic and learn what it really means. If the stories were true then where did the people who Adam and Eves children eventually mate with come from .... was it incest?
2007-08-29 16:58:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kimberlee Ann 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
You've likely heard that evolution is a "theory," and you think that's a synonym for "myth." But in science, the word "theory" doesn't mean conjecture or speculation. It means that a principle is plausible, that it is scientifically acceptable, that it has been tested. So, your question of whether evolution is "Myth or Real" doesn't make any sense. It's a theory.
And as for Catholicism's influence on your feelings toward evolution (and probably Anthropology and Paleontology in total), you should know that many of the early workers in the field, the ones who used to dig up the bones (you should read the story of Mary Anning, the fossil-hunter), were deeply religious. They saw uncovering what lay in the Earth as a way to be closer to God's creation, a way of appreciating it. If your religion teaches you to turn your back on the planet, the soil, the land-- the home God gave you, according to Christianity-- don't you think there's something wrong with it? Why do so many religious people these days assume that loving the Earth, and learning from it, goes against their faith?
I encourage you to read Mary Anning's biography, from her early years as a religious person, to her later years when she felt disillusioned, and see what you think. You might decide to stick with your current opinions (that's up to you, of course), but at least read about evolution, read about the history of Christianity and Christians' relation to evolution, and make sure that your opinions are educated.
2007-08-29 18:25:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Roald Ellsworth 5
·
7⤊
0⤋
I think all those skeletons are trying to tell us something. The Bible was written so long ago-before the idea of evolution could be addressed-maybe there is a way it is supposed to work together but the writers of the Bible didn't understand the concept. I think when the proof is in front of you, it is foolish to put your head in a book and ignore the facts. I think that you shouldn't have to choose one or the other but that a better explanation is out there somewhere.
2007-08-30 14:21:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by towanda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That doesn't follow at all. Pope John Paul II realized that evolutionary theory is one of the most widely-proven theories in science, way back in 1996. http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html
Pope Benedict, who is more conservative than his predecessor, also acknowledges all of the evidence in favor of evolution: http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22136550-5002700,00.html
Both of these men realized that the theory of evolution does not preclude faith in God. As a Catholic, you should have no problem with this. If you have a _personal_ problem, that's different. All I can suggest is that you read up on evolution, from the perspective of the actual scientists who study this. Usually, creationists trying to argue against evolution have their facts wrong, so they aren't a good resource. This is a good website, and they also have a reading list: http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-evolution.html
2007-08-30 10:22:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by random6x7 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
very real.It's amazing that people still in this day and age have to still wonder if evolution is "myth or real" that was the 20th century. Lets move on with the time. And figure out somthing important.
2007-08-29 18:13:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by @lex 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
If it became supported by way of some laboratory curiosities and that's all, that isn't any longer appropriate very plenty. that isn't any longer the case. different than for the mountains of academic info, we've some sensible purposes. The mining and oil industries relies upon on a popularity that the Earth is plenty older than the countless thousand years claimed by way of youthful-Earth creationists. It mechanically turns up info that their flood, it truly is an crucial component to their tale did no longer and could desire to no longer have exceeded off. It relies upon on assessment of the age of rocks by way of the fossil organisms they contain. If those organisms existed till the meant flood, then the a while could desire to no longer be assessed. It additionally relies upon on issues like radiometric courting of rocks, (no longer carbon 14) which the extra youthful-Earth creationists insist are no longer valid. yet another factor of that's the rising biotechnology marketplace. this relies upon on widespread biology of which the thought and certainty of evolution are crucial areas. If biology became no longer a valid technology, then the tens of millions spent on study into new drugs, insecticides etc may be valueless and all their 1000's of high priced patents might advise no longer something. in assessment, the type of patent purposes generated by way of "advent technology" can likely matter on the palms and feet. you will possibly no longer even could desire to take the two footwear off.
2016-10-03 09:37:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is scientific theory. that means its not myth or fact. there are many observed forms of evolution you can watch during your life span. birds often change beak shapes in accordance with the food that is available.
scientific theory is just a way of attempting to explain something by human observation.
myth is closer aligned with religion -- you have nothing to observe but stories passed down from generation to generation.
2007-08-29 19:15:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that you should learn more about the teachings of the Catholic Church. While everything is ultimately ascribed to God, including the special soul of man, there is an acknowledgement that God's plan can include evolution.
This is the church that excommunicated Galileo because the higher-ups did not want to consider the possibility that the Earth revolved around the Sun, not vice versa. Oops. The church hierarchy is more careful not to repudiate science so quickly these days.
2007-08-29 14:50:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Molly McTrouble 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
Me thinks Ya need to be a doin much more readin before Ya come down on a point like evolution, no matter what religious sooth-sayers are a sayin.
What think?
Jim D
2007-08-31 13:00:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋