Was it a top priority of Clinton to protect innocent people?
Isn't that the first thing policemen are taught to do?
2007-08-29 13:33:26 · 16 answers · asked by Duminos 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What did the coroner say was the proximate cause ?
2007-08-29 13:37:43 · update #1
David Koresh and his nut followers killed them.
They should have let them go before they burned down their compound.
2007-08-29 13:38:49 · answer #1 · answered by arvis3 4 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Why did Federal Agents repeatedly lie about shooting up the compound -------HUH?????----and why did the agents force news camera crews to leave before the slaughter began??? The agents under Janet Reno's command slaughtered the commune without regard for the lives of the people inside and then torched the place. This was a horrible era in law-enforcement......horrible
2007-08-29 14:12:23 · answer #2 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Now now do not blame clinton, even tho the buck stopped at his desk. Or did it??? Just where did that dam puck stop??? Maybe at hillary??? reno that's who she killed them. That dam puck kept on getting in king clintons way.
It was not top priority to protect anyone. Just look at how many times we were attacked. But he did protect his A*SS when he caught caught with his pants down. No pun intended.
2007-08-29 13:47:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The responsibility for those children ultimately lies with David Koresh and their parents. Clinton did not make Koresh brainwash those parents and keep their children to be abused emotionally and physically by a madman.
2007-08-29 13:39:43 · answer #4 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The blood on Janets hands make the Current AG look good. Hell, That does not even count Elian & the Stormtroopers.
2007-08-29 13:49:35 · answer #5 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I blame David Koresh.
2007-08-29 13:41:57 · answer #6 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, there's no way on Earth some maniacal cult leader would have killed them, right?
You do know how the more extreme cults end, right? Mass Suicide, how come it's not possible to you cons when it comes to the wackos in Waco?
2007-08-29 13:38:39 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Oh well, now, they became what some might call fried chicken, didn't they? The whole episode was as tragic for America, as a mother and father watching their child be murdered, and unable to save them.
2007-08-29 13:43:08 · answer #8 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
David Koresh had them all killed.
You know that OCD is treatable, right? See a doctor.
2007-08-29 13:51:07 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They ran out of patience "helping" them - so they killed them.
I hope that when the wheel turns round that Janet. Bill, and everyone else that participated in that slaughter pay their full measure for the horror those kids must of gone through...
2007-08-29 13:43:45 · answer #10 · answered by Michael M 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Steph and Lindsey g, the funny thing about your answers to this question is that if it would have been Bush and Gonzo, you would have ripped them a new A@@ on here, I love the liberal hypocrisy it's out tonight.
2007-08-29 13:47:04 · answer #11 · answered by dez604 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋