Defend the three members of the Mc Cann party who named reobert Murat in their evidence to the Police. Why if Murat has now been cleared of any wrong doing did they do this?
2007-08-29
10:59:35
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
Cheek of it all, what is your point?
I am reporting the facts here, what are you saying?
2007-08-29
11:15:12 ·
update #1
Stephen King. The only person hiding behind the facts are the Mc CAnns. The fund is a limited company not a charity. Only a Charity can have trustees. A charity is answerable to the Charities Commision. The limited company set up by the Mc Canns is answerable to no one. They can spend the money as they please and tell no one where it has gone. As for the Mc Canns, they left three children under four alone whilst they went to the pub, was that responsible parenting? The Mc Canns won`t sue because they know their actions on the night in question, their friends actions and their actions since will be put under professional scrutiny in a court of law. So get your facts right before you come here and try to spout rubbish about something you clearly don`t understand!
2007-08-29
11:55:40 ·
update #2
They're looking for a scapegoat, someone to blame, I used to feel sorry for them but things become more sinister by the day. Its so sad.
2007-08-29 11:06:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
12⤊
3⤋
A few things, first of all Murat accused the police of making him a scapegoat.
Second I'm sure you believe that Murat's lawyer said the bloody McCanns should go home and he was blaming them for what happened to Murat. Well read the link.
Yes the fund was set up as a limited company, it couldn't be set up as a charity. They will have to file accounts and of course they will be able to trace funds going out of the bank. If the McCanns try to simply live off the funds do you honestly think the UK press won't turn against them?
2007-08-29 12:33:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
ok purely a concept i haven't aired earlier......... Does all and sundry keep in mind the holiday Camps interior the united kingdom that ran from with regard to the late Nineteen Thirties to the Nineteen Seventies and 1880s, Butlins, Pontins, Warners etc? I worked at Butlins Clacton interior the late 1960s in the process the summer season between college and college and became right into somewhat stunned to be certain that leaving little ones unattended drowsing interior the night interior the chalets became into actively inspired so as that the mummy and dad ought to circulate out and take benefit of the entertainments and eating places and bars. The babysitting service presented became into regularly occurring as chalet patrol and consisted of a few women driving around the super rows of chalets on bicycles listening out from the pathways for a crying newborn who had woken up. of direction there have been no cellular telephones then, so as that they might record to a frequently used administration place of work each and every so often and the chalet numbers would be broadcast over the frequently used public handle equipment. i'm not mentioning any opinion, that's in basic terms an commentary, and a factor of our historic past that i won't be able to help thinking approximately concerning the McCanns' difficulty. i don't think of you could say the two that the international became into that lots extra secure interior the midst of the final century, Butlin's became into looking it extremely not straight forward to get workforce with the aid of this time by way of fact the working situations have been so undesirable and maximum of their secure practices workforce have been ex cons. i don't keep in mind listening to approximately any abductions interior the clicking, there became into undeniably the prospect for them, yet truthfully this technique would desire to have brought about some injuries of various tiers of severity with the aid of the years? purely a concept, sorry if i've got upset all and sundry.
2016-10-17 06:18:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the McCanns this, Murat that, the portugese police the other...... and there was me thinking the only only thing to focus on was discovering what happened to a defenceless, frightened child who has been missing for over three months. I care not for anybody in the papers in this issue bar Madeline. As a parent I wish for nothing other than her return.
2007-09-02 21:44:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well I agree with Stephen King on this one.
There is no point in your asking a questions if you don't like the answers you receive. Why ? because they do not agree with Gospel according to middenraker. Get over yourself.
We all have an opinion. Just some of us use some commonsense in answering or asking them. How do you know that they didn't see him hanging around the place. You seem to know an awful lot about it. Were you there? Shouldn't you be giving your evidence to the police.
2007-09-01 03:18:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
i would and could never leave my children alone while i went for a meal
regardless to the age of my children
it really don't matter what country your in you just don't
there are too many questions running around about the disappearance
and the main one is they were irresponsible
if they sue any one maybe they should think why they did such a stupid act in the first place?
it's going to make the media and the normal joe blog think the same thing
2007-09-02 21:42:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by areyurflowersinbloom 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think Murat deliberately elevated his status to arguido just so that he had the right to legal representation. If he is innocent and he is cleared then he should sue the pants off every paper that villified him during the past 3-4 months, starting with the Mirror reporter who glorified herself for capturing the villain.
2007-08-29 11:19:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Delly xx 5
·
7⤊
2⤋
I heard there are mentally ill people smearing the McCanns 1000s of times in Yahoo Answers
2007-09-04 08:39:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
These endless McCann questions are the broken record to end all broken records
Stephen King, a great answer and I think you understand the haters very well, notice that this er "person" who asked the question was forced to reply to your answer
2007-09-03 00:44:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by London Man 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Tapas gang are very good at taking the heat off themselves and putting it on to other people ,first Murat,then the people who were supposed to be stalking them earlier in the holiday,then the man who hired the car with the child seat ,then the intruders who were supposedly prowling around the apartment. The man from Mars will be next. They are all a cart load of liars and deserve each other. The truth will smack them in the face soon.
2007-08-29 11:54:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by little weed 6
·
5⤊
4⤋
I dont remember Murat being called a murderer, he was called a suspect.
If EVERY suspect that had their name in the paper sued, there would be no papers left.
2007-08-29 19:01:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by LEXY 4
·
2⤊
2⤋