English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said there are limits. Even though she described herself as "a tax-and-spend liberal," Waters said the federal government can't do everything. Besides, she said, there are some problems that need to be solved by local and state governments.

"I would not look to the Congress of the United States to solve those problems," she said. "Where is the heat that has been placed on your state government?” “What about putting some heat under them?"


http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/08/storm_survivors_told_to_get_ac.html

I agree with Rep. Waters. What are your opinions?

2007-08-29 07:52:58 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

27 answers

I agree with Democrat Waters (and you) also.

that being said - I do feel sorry for the people that got screwed by their insurance companies.
most of the poor will never get to go home to New Orleans.
that city will be rebuilt for people that have cash to invest.

2007-08-29 08:00:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I wonder if they drafted her to say that because it would be more politically acceptable. It is absolutely ridiculous. Here is a new rule, if you live in a disaster area before the hurricane, you do not get a new house because of a hurricane. Living in trailers? These are brand new trailers provided free of charge. I would be willing to bet they are a lot nicer than the places where most of these people lived beforehand (Now that is not politically correct, but NO was a very poor city). I realize there are many, many people who have been hurt by this. However, I think it is outrageous what has been spent at this point and that people are still complaining. It is the victim/entitlement mentality perpetuated when the government tries to portray itself as the savior of all who may be downtrodden.

Of course, any figures you see about spending dont forget Haliburton took their 50% right off the top.

2007-08-29 15:17:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Note the link you have doesn't work. But I agree. I mean people were given money afterwards but wasted it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14574567/

4 Billion dollars given and most gone as of February 2006 when this article was made.

People received money, one guy instead of using it for bills and all that, decided to use it to get a sex change operation. Nice. I am glad taxpayers money went for relief funds and ended up being spent frivolously.

New Orleans screwed themselves in the beginning anyways. Bush told the governor and mayor about the hurricane but both said no, we can handle it, stay out of it. Well look at what happened. There were buses under water that were suppose to evacuate people out of the city, but were not used, because for some strange, odd reason they thought they could live normal everyday lives during a hurricane, a powerful one at that.

So people need to stop blaming the President and everyone else because they were stupid enough to stay in their houses during a hurricane! Links showing that everyone was warned before Katrina hit.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/02/fema.tapes/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WEATHER/08/28/hurricane.katrina/index.html

This is just being milked for more money and typical point the finger at everyone else except for the ones to truly be blamed for it.

Definition of hurricane:

1. A severe tropical cyclone originating in the equatorial regions of the Atlantic Ocean or Caribbean Sea or eastern regions of the Pacific Ocean, traveling north, northwest, or northeast from its point of origin, and usually involving heavy rains.
2. A wind with a speed greater than 74 miles (119 kilometers) per hour, according to the Beaufort scale.
3. Something resembling a hurricane in force or speed.

Now people know what not to live in and to runaway from for future references. You are welcome.

2007-08-29 15:08:15 · answer #3 · answered by Fallen 6 · 2 1

You know for damn sure that the people of New Orleans are taking advantage of the government hand outs when a self described "tax and spend liberal" says enough is enough.

I do agree with her that more responsibility needs to come from the state and local governments. But the people down there shouldn't rely on them either, they need to take some innitiative and try to be more responsible for their own well being.

2007-08-29 16:07:59 · answer #4 · answered by Ninja Rabbit 007 4 · 4 2

Totally agree...

Gov Blanco and Mayor Nagin are primarily responsible for this entire fiasco. If it wasn't for their poor leadership the situation in New Orleans might be quite different. Their example for the citizens of New Orleans is to sit around and wait for the federal government to do something. Instead they should be leading the charge to take back the city and rebuild what can and should be rebuilt and make the tough decision to condemn those areas that should not.
Instead, they do what they do best... flap their gums and point fingers.

2007-08-29 15:21:01 · answer #5 · answered by Iceman 3 · 5 1

I sure do! We have already given Louisiana 7 1/2 billion dollars and due to their bureaucracy everyone will not get their homes rebuilt/repaired as the checks will run out before 60,000 of these families get help. Louisiana will then ask for more funding. I do not approve more of my tax dollars going into their errors. Apparently, Louisiana needed a watch dog to be sure the funds were properly dispersed. Too many hands in the money and far to much going into the application process for the approval of these funds to families that needed them.

2007-08-29 16:27:54 · answer #6 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 3 1

I think maxine is being generous in her self description, she is more like a tax and spend socialist, but, she has this one right. LA has had tons of money given to them, they have a long history of political corruption and much of the Federal monies received in the last three decades has been pilfered. At some point the voters are going to have to clean house because we cannot continue to support their career crooks down there.

2007-08-29 16:03:35 · answer #7 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 3 1

I think we should completely disband the military and NASA and give all of those billions of dollars to the Katrina victims, but only those "victims" in the New Orleans area.
I figure we could give each victim $2 million dollars a year so they can enjoy the good life. I for one would be happy to have my taxes raised so that the federal government can give a full $90,000 a year salary to every person in poverty. Why should people be deprived of the American dream just because they don't work?

2007-08-29 15:07:18 · answer #8 · answered by heavysarcasm 4 · 2 3

I have been an American Red Cross volunteer for 15 years.
I was in New Orleans post Katrina, 649 families relocated to our city here in SC. I worked with FEMA getting benefits for these people, went to DC as a case reviewer for long term, unmet needs of these clients. I must say that there are plenty of programs out there to help them in their recovery. They need to take the necessary steps to aid themselves in recovering from the storm. Granted, there is a lot of paperwork that needs to be filled out, charitable organizations have a new program, that we all input data and compare what services have already been provided to the client so as there is no duplication of services. The clients must provide proof that they actually LIVED there as so much fraud has been uncovered. Utility companies and property tax records are necessary for proof. At this time, many people have received large FEMA checks, insurance checks, charitable funds, rental assistance for 18 months, additional rents paid by charitable organizations, furniture, food stamps but it is necessary to file and make a plan for your own recovery. The governor also has the Road Home which will give up to $50,000 to rebuild their home and a FEMA trailer to live on the land where your previous house was so that you can rebuild. Many people just failed to help themselves recover, it is up to them. New Orleans was not built in 2 years, it cannot be rebuilt in the 2 years. It is an old city that took years to build, what can you really expect? Habitat for Humanity is still down there, the Amish are still down there rebuilding, but people have to help themselves recover and move on. Many of the clients I spoke with would never return to that city because of the crime and corruption.

2007-08-29 15:10:51 · answer #9 · answered by slk29406 6 · 9 1

Incredible. I never thought I would be saying "I agree with Maxine Waters". Did hell just freeze over?

2007-08-30 07:30:12 · answer #10 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers