Have you ever taken a few moments to do a search on Snopes or Wiki . I can't remember which one , but one of them(I think Snopes) has a detailed list of what they call 'logical' explanations for all of them . But ya know what I find to be more incredible ? The many , many victims that died in a plane crash , and automobile accidents .
I don't care how many people the Clintons know , there's no way that anyone could know so many plane crash victims all from separate plane crashes . That's not even close to credible .
IBM 'knows' lots of people. . . . do they have as many plane crashes ?
George Bush knows lots of people. . . . do they have as many plane crashes ?
Billy Graham knows loads of people. .. . do they have as many plane crashes ?
I never spent much time on the subject , but after someone posted a question about it , I looked it up and I'm telling ya there's a ton of unanswered questions and a ton of bullsh!t lies and excuses .
Can someone post a link(I can't) to it ?
2007-08-29 07:44:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They must have a squad of Luca Brasi types in their employ
.
The question you raise is a legitimate one as even a cursory study of the number of people who've expired while an acquaintance of the Clinton's' is puzzling.
Nothing a rhetorician would sloganeer like "Bush lied and people died".
2007-08-29 07:58:01 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
In all honesty, when someone brings up, say, Bush's alleged cocaine use, or the claim that he said the Constitution was just a "piece of paper," I always say that unless a NAMED source comes forward ON THE RECORD and gives CREDIBLE testimony, I won't believe it. (This is, in my opinion, what we have in the Juanita Broaddrick case.)
So I am duty-bound to say the same here.
I do not know of any credbile evidence that the Clintons were implicated in people's deaths. I assume that if there was some, US libel laws are "loose" enough that some reporter would have come up with a story by now, and that SOME conservative outlet with some reputation for veracity would have published it. If and when the National Reivew or the Weekly Standard get interested, I will give it more credence.
Maybe I missed something.
I really do NOT want to see Clinton as president.
But I have to be consistent.
I do not know of any reliable evidence. I'm sure lists are out there, but again nothing reliable.
2007-08-29 15:09:18 · answer #2 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Here ya go Earnest. I think if any of those connections could be proved the Republican Clinton Haters would have done it already. If any of it is true either the Clintons are the smartest people we've ever had in the White House for getting away with it or the Republicans who claim these things are the most incompetent group ever for not being able to prove it.
Clinton Hit List Debunking: http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
2007-08-29 15:19:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Does this mean that Paul Wellstone, David Kelly, and William Colby were all friends of the Clintons too?
2007-08-29 14:51:44 · answer #4 · answered by ck4829 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It is amazing, I saw this a few years ago and if someone wants to look at a conspiracy on the JFK assassination I sure don't know how they miss some kind of mass conspiracy on this type of death toll.
2007-08-30 16:21:42 · answer #5 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've read the same, I'll try to find a link.
http://www.lizmichael.com/clintond.htm
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
2007-08-29 14:52:06 · answer #6 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I looked up the individual names and then followed a bunch of the links with them. It was enough to blow me away! I mean someone really needs to get this stuff out in the open but then considering what happened to these people maybe not!
2007-08-29 14:57:05 · answer #7 · answered by Brianne 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Well...we could make a list of the people Bush is responsible for killing, but we'd have to cut down the rest of the Amazon rain-forest to make the paper.
2007-08-29 14:56:50 · answer #8 · answered by socrates 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
This list has been debunked so many times, only a total fool would still believe it. However, if you want to talk about plane crashes, there are 3,000 people who died on 9/11 because Bush wouldn't read a memo from Condi Rice. And there are another 4,000 who died because he thought getting Saddam Hussein and his oil was more important than getting Osama bin Laden.
2007-08-29 14:50:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 6⤋
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/clintons.asp
2007-08-29 14:51:56 · answer #10 · answered by here to help 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋