saying that flight 77 (which crashed into the pentagon) and flight 11 (which crashed into the north tower) were not scheduled to fly?
If they didnt fly then what about the passengers that died?
does this support the conspiracy theory that it was NOT a plane that crashed into the pentagon?
This is just strange to me.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=50132865
2007-08-29 07:35:17 · 7 answers · asked by friskygimp 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
you can track who did the editing thru the IP address.
and I'm not saying wikipedia is the only or best source for information....but seeing that millions of people use it every day it is cause for concern.
2007-08-29 09:39:34 · update #1
what would you expect out of a corp, the truth, there's no profit margin in the truth
2007-08-29 07:39:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Interesting, but who knows who actually edited the page. Wikipedia's process for changes should be better and clearer. If true and actually posted by an official in the know from American, it would corroborate other reports to that effect which have been circulating for a while. It does sound like crazy conspiracy theory on the surface, but less so in light of the fact that part of Operation Northwoods, a Pentagon proposal to stage terror attacks as a pretext to war with Cuba, plane switching scenarios were discussed in some detail. If you don't believe it, pdfs of the actual documents are widely available on the web, and they can also be found at the National Archives. It's part of the public record.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1
Sorry Jeeper. You are clearly relying on the flawed Popular Mechanics analysis, which points out (correctly) that the debris reported by the source in question was more like 1.5 miles rather than 6 (as if that is even believable), while failing to mention reports from three Pittsburgh area papers that claimed debris was found over a mountain 8 miles away. Selective debunking.
2007-08-29 07:46:57 · answer #2 · answered by haywood jablome 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Just FYI: Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world around us, according to a study published this week in the journal Nature.
2007-08-29 07:57:02 · answer #3 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea, I guess the hundreds of people in DC who saw the plane hit the pentagon, are all just lying huh ?
Or that all the fire fighters and police officers in DC who responded to the pentagon are all lying.
Its a conspiracy, the government has paid thousands of americans, to keep the truth hidden.
Why people believe the conspiracy nuts i'll never know.
Like the nuts who said flight 93 had to be shot down, because they found wreckage at Indian lake, and it was 5 miles from the crash site.
Except the conspiracy nuts, had used map quest to find the distance, instead of using their brains.
The driving distance was 5 miles, the real distance was less than a mile.
Opps, well duh huh !!!!!
I guess air plane debris, didn't know it was supposed to use the roads to get where it was going.
LMAO
2007-08-29 08:25:18 · answer #4 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Wikipedia is becomming a terrible source of info. They think a computer technician is an entity or company that is known globally or nation wide. I think a computer technician is an individual.
2007-08-29 07:46:43 · answer #5 · answered by MyMysteryId 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wikipedia is a lousy source for any information. Used by liberals more than anyone.
2007-08-29 07:39:29 · answer #6 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
How do you know that it was American Airlines and not the Tin-foil Hat Society that did the editing?
2007-08-29 07:39:44 · answer #7 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋