Overturning Gay Marriage Bans?

Question

How would concerned citizens against ANY TYPE of discrimination work to overturn some provisions of Gay Marriage Amendments now in force? For example, Kentucky has a gay marriage ban in place and also forbids Civil Unions. How could citizens uphold the ban, while working to alter the amendment to allow Civil Unions?

And let me add, I am not a gay person, but I am disgusted by ANY type of discrimination. Separate but equal, is never equal.

"Now, I say to you today my friends, even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: - We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

Answer 1

Is it discrimination to deny people from getting welfare only because they are rich? Why should the gvmt deny someone of federal benefits based solely on their incomes?

Clearly the best solution is to get the gvmt out of defining what a marriage is. Why do couples need a piece of paper from the state to tell them that they are married? Don't they know that without the paper?

There is no reason why gvmt should regulate a marriage.

Answer 2

the 2d replace to the U.S. shape states, "A nicely regulated protection rigidity, being necessary to the risk-free practices of a loose State, the ultimate of the individuals to maintain and endure hands, shall no longer be infringed". The Illinois and cook dinner County's gun administration rules have been for sure an infringement of the ultimate of the individuals of Illinois and cook dinner County to "save and endure hands" this grow to be for sure a violation of the U.S. shape and rightly jugded un-Constitutional. Proposition 8 grow to be a California pollproposition that sought to alter the California shape to function a clean section (7.5) to Article I, that could examine: "in basic terms marriage between a guy and a woman is valid or recognized in California. U.S. District court docket decide Vaughn Walker got here across that the ban on gay marriage violated due technique and equivalent risk-free practices as assured below the form. The Fourteenth replace U.S. shape states, no State shall make or implement any regulation which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of electorate of u . s .; nor shall any State deprive somebody of existence, liberty, or assets, devoid of due physique of suggestions of regulation; nor deny to somebody interior of its jurisdiction the equivalent risk-free practices of the guidelines. Proposition 8 does not deprive somebody of existence, liberty, or assets, devoid of due physique of suggestions of regulation.

Answer 3

You can't really. Just cuz the government would never allow it. Just go to Canada and get married, but be warned, in Canada you have to wait 5 years to get a divorce.

Answer 4

Dont change it. It is the traditional and correct intereptation of Marriage.

But if you really want to change it... then work to pass an amendment to the state (commonwealth for Kentucky) constitution.

Answer 5

All the bans are illegal and unconstitutional per the decision of the US Supreme Court in Santa Fey vs Doe in 2000


To whoever gave me a thumbs down...Go choke since you obviously hate truth and fact

Answer 6

Homosexuality is an aberration. It is not normal behavior. Those who try to get some sort of name attached are trying to legitimize illegitimate behavior. Trying to put the state's blessing on something does not make it right.

Answer 7

because we allow christains to get away with it. .