http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295031,00.html
OR
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295005,00.html
And why isn't the first on the any other news site?
2007-08-29 07:09:05 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
diogenese_97, does it really matter where it came from? If you don't believe the headline...prove it wrong.
As far as Hillary not knowing, don't you think it would be a really good plan to check out a person before you except millions of dollars from them?
Had this been a republican, I'm sure that's what everyone would be screaming.
2007-08-29 08:13:05 · update #1
The Hsu item is being rigorously pursued by the San Francisco Chronicle because of all of the campaign donations coming out of a simple home in Daly City. So, the charge isn't being led by a media outlet of the "vast right-wing conspiracy". There should be some info on the link below. Still it's not Senator Clinton's fault. Money comes in from all over. If she had personally done a little-arm twisting of Mister Hsu that would be a different story.
The Craig matter can be easily resolved. He needs to resign. He can't represent his state effectively anymore.
2007-08-29 10:37:03 · answer #1 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You aren't going to get alot of people to believe that Fox just wants to keep you informed...
Maybe the fact that the story is only on Fox and in those bogus emails should tell you something... it's largely cooked up, perhaps?
In fact, the only other news source to have anything about it is the Wall Street Journal... and guess who owns that?
The Craig thing is the bigger story when you add Allen into the equation... he is the Florida GOPer who was also arrested for gay soliciting this week... it's getting quite common with Republicans.... that cannot be denied.
2007-08-29 17:30:24 · answer #2 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good source, Fox Noise. Craig is a hypocrite and deserves to be thrown out. Hillary may not know about Hau and is not connected with the scandal. Try finding a better source for your information than the liars at Fox. You will never get the facts from O'Reilly, only BS.
2007-08-29 15:02:10 · answer #3 · answered by diogenese_97 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
USA Today put both in one story. The first is on several other web sites, but is old news about a non candidate. The second will surely doom the guy in a very anti-gay party.
2007-08-29 15:19:56 · answer #4 · answered by Eric 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Larry Craig scandal.
2007-08-29 14:15:06 · answer #5 · answered by your_dear_old_mother 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
craig scandal if you are soliciting in bathrooms and then go home and preach morals in the senate and on the campaign trail; it always comes out when you are a hypocrite and judge society; no one is without faults; it is called being human so you can't point the finger and pretend to be better than everyone , anyone; it comes back and bites you hard
2007-08-29 14:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by sml 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well of course the Republican will be the laser focus between the two. If it were a Dem, he would be called progressive.
The Hillary thing. Just keep in mind that for LibDems, it's a one way only street.
2007-08-29 15:06:40 · answer #7 · answered by dave b 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Rep. Larry Craig pleading guilty to lewd conduct for soliciting sex in a public toilet for sure. He is a Senator in the US Congress for goodness sakes !!
2007-08-29 14:32:42 · answer #8 · answered by lightwriter 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋