If President Bush held a press conference in which he said. "I lied about why we went to Iraq" How many republicans will still support the war and the President? I am guessing 100%
Please don't say "well the dems supported the war as well, and bla bla bla"….They supported the war based on lies from the President, once they realized the mistake they where/are big enough to admit it.
Also I dare you to answer with out bringing up a Clinton. Please just answer the question at hand.
2007-08-29 06:32:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He'd better say:
I've never been with that woman.
2007-08-29 06:39:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Seeing as how the liaison between Congress and the CIA was a democrat who was chairman of the committee - who convinced most his party to pull for going to war...
Who was convinced by the CIA reports and advised his party as such...
Who also convinced many republican senators too...
(That part of your question has zero merit.)
Did the President lie? No. He was mis-guided by many reports like everyone else was.
Reports not only from the CIA, but from dozens of other Countries too.
So did he actually "lie?"
Hard saying.
Did Senator Ted Kennedy actually kill a woman during a car accident when a car went off a bridge? Hard saying. But he did leave her and didn't say a word to anybody about it.
Clinton? Bring up Bill Clinton and the bj he said he never got?
You won't believe this hearing it from me, but the reason why there was semen on a blue dress wasn't because the chick less than half his age knew how to swallow.
2007-08-29 14:00:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I LOVE the second answer to this question. You know, the one that says Bush was using intel that Clinton used while he was President.
That would make it AT LEAST four years old at the time of the Iraq invasion in 2003.
That means that we are now invading countries for what they USED TO do.
And that person is okay with this.
2007-08-29 13:54:16 · answer #3 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And what would that change. Iraq is still in shambles. It doesn't really matter why we went in anymore. We did, and now we need a structure plan to create a sovereign nation that promotes peace and tolerance. We need to figure out how to win, not cry about we shouldn't be there. So far the surge seems to be making progress. What do you suggest to continue or expedite more progress in Iraq?
2007-08-29 13:45:13 · answer #4 · answered by gracilism 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You don't want to hear the truth, but; The President did not lie about Iraq. The intelligence on Iraq was the same intelligence they had under Bill Clinton, it was the same intelligence that the Senate Intelligence Comitee had access to.
The President does not sit in his office writing down intelligence reports with Dick Cheney & Karl Rove coaching him.
Learn before you try to teach
2007-08-29 13:41:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are you saying that the democrats that voted for the war can't think for themsleves? They can't blame it on "lies" from the president. They had access to the same documents and reports that he did. Which is worse acting on history, intelligence reports and UN sanction violations or just doing it because you don't feel the need to take the time to form your own opinion?
2007-08-29 13:42:53 · answer #6 · answered by Rich people employ me 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
OK , Genius . The 9/11 Report stated very clearly that the president did not lie .
Intelligence from all over the world said Saddam had WMD's .
And if he said he lied(a stupid question) then I would NOT support him .
2007-08-29 13:42:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush will never give a press conference just to cater to your fantasies. What lies are you talking about?
2007-08-29 13:42:07 · answer #8 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
That wouldn't happen. The man is incapable of saying anything more than "mistakes were made".
2007-08-29 13:57:23 · answer #9 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋