Look up cubic equation. It is a standard formula that does the same thing as the quadratic does for squared equations.............
..
2007-08-29 05:12:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by muddypuppyuk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's quite complex in comparision with the quatratic once.... There is a long-length formula for this...
Now, the concept behind this formula is applying some linear transformation to the equation to end up with the form K*X^3 + L*X + N = 0 (can be done with all cubic equations). Then, for the solutions one proceeds using the roots of unity.
Specifically, we factorize x^3 - 3*a*b + a^3 + b^3, i.e.
x^3 - 3*a*b + a^3 + b^3 = (x + a + b)*(x + a*o +b*o^2)*(x + b*o +a*o^2)
where o = -1/2 + i*sqrt(3)/2 i.e a complex third root of unity
Now, the complex roots of x^3 - 3*a*b + a^3 + b^3= 0 are obviously: x = - (a + b), x = - (a*o +b*o^2) and x = - (b*o + a*o^2) SOLUTIONS (I)
Then, we compare:
x^3 - 3*a*b + a^3 + b^3= 0
with K*X^3 + L*X + N = 0 or equivalently X^3 + (L/K)*X + (N/K) = 0. From this we obtain:
L/K = - 3*a*b and N/K = a^3 + b^3. We proceed by solving this simulatneous equation to find a, b in terms of K, L, M and substitute to SOLUTIONS (I) to get some new solutions. To find the final solutions of our initial equation we apply the inverse initial linear tranformation to the solutions.... and voila the general cubic equation is solved...
As you realize solving your equation requires a lot lof of algebraic calculations . . . that's why the cubic formula is much much bigger than the quatratic...
2007-08-29 05:42:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Christos :) 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, there is Cardan's Cubic Formula, but it is kind of hard to actually use. If you want to see it, view the links in the source. You can imagine it is not exactly practical.
2007-08-29 05:17:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Edgar Greenberg 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes there is, but it is very complicated.
The solution of ax3+bx2+cx+d=0 is found at :Mouse over link.
http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/~schectex/courses/cubic
2007-08-29 05:29:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by ironduke8159 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can either use the horner diagram or put where x= y - b/3a
reform the equasition to this form x^3=px + q
and then use this
x= CRT(q/2 + SQRT(D)) + CRT(Q/2- SQRT(D)) where
D=(q/2)^2 - (p/3)^2
SQRT= square root
CRT= cubic root
P.S. if I were you I would put my faith with Horner
2007-08-29 05:15:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by mountz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
not that I am aware of. Above the second degree it pretty much by hook or crook. Generally you test for rational roots and use synthetic division to locate real ones.
2007-08-29 05:10:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by chasrmck 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm pretty sure the answer for x is 0; I graphed it on my graphing calc, and that's what I got.
2007-08-29 05:15:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by cricketr77 2
·
0⤊
1⤋