No. The line of succession is set by British law, more complicated than I want to give attention to but Camilla is not royal and children from an earlier marriage would not be either. If she had a child by Charles that would probably shake things up a bit.
2007-08-29 01:15:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by chessale 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Since the step son is not in the blood line of Prince Charles, I would say no, he wouldn't get the throne. An uncle or cousin would probably end up next in line. Now, if Camilla and Charles has a son, then he would be next in line.
2007-08-29 08:16:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by George P 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not if he was a step son the throne would go to Prince charles brother.......if charles and camilla had a legit son though he would be in line but they are both kinda old and i dont see this happening!!
2007-08-31 16:10:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No usually the blood line is kept in the royal family. Also--Camilla is no longer able to have any type of children with Charles It has been noted that she has had a hysterectomy due to some complication.
2007-08-29 08:19:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by cherriwaves 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hoo, let's face it -- Camilla is not less attractive than Charles. They are probably very comfortable with one another's looks, and it's really not anyone else's place to worry about it.
2007-08-29 09:18:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Crystal 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you taken a good look at her?
A more appropriate question would be.
If Prince Charles had sex with Camilla would he deserve a medal?
Can you imagine what that kid would look like?
2007-08-29 08:24:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by hoovarted 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Stepchildren are not of the Blood Royal and have no place in the succession just because their parent later married into royalty.
2007-08-29 08:14:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bill 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
It would pass to Charles's oldest brother, then to those children, etc.
2007-08-29 08:18:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by lundstroms2004 6
·
1⤊
0⤋