How many people would've had to be involved? This is reason #10 million why the conspiracy theorists or "troofers" are insane. How many people would it have taken to pull this all off? Including WTC personnel? Unless you think the government is that good that they could sneak into the towers and plant all those explosives without being caught?? Wouldn't people at the airlines have to be involved in it too? Wouldn't they be denying that those planes ever took off - or that all the cockpit recordings/cell phone transmissions were all fake??
Don't forget about the missle that was fired into the Pentagon in broad daylight in busy Washington DC!!! Because after all, there is no cartoon-like punch hole through the Pentagon's walls.
2007-08-28 19:06:55 · 9 answers · asked by SW1 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yeah Bush is not, it was done years in advance. Back before Bush was even governor of Texas he was already plotting a vicious terror attack on America if and when he becomes President!
2007-08-28 20:36:55 · update #1
Well, for instance to rig a building that size with enough explosives to bring it down it would take a crew of hundreds to get the job done. Not to mention the fact that there was always people in the WTC day and night. So you would have had to paid those hundreds, maybe thousands of people off to ignore the drilling into the walls by the paid off crew who was planting the explosives. It would have taken weeks to rig it with enough explosives to do this.
Thats just a small part of what it would have taken. The conspiracy crowd need to stick with Bigfoot research.
2007-08-28 19:43:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
911 may or may not have been an inside job, that part doesnt matter so much. It is what the government did AFTER 911 that we should be looking at...they used that tragedy to instill laws, and policies that take away our freedom, using fear as the reason to keep us 'in line', slowly changing democracy into theocracy, and this is the excuse they keep using to invade all the middle eastern countries too. This tactic isnt new, just look at the Reichstag fire and what happened afterward. It doesnt matter who did what, it is the actions taken to 'pre empt' future 'uprisings'' from taking place that we should worry about more.
2007-08-29 05:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by shrekky 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say at least 50 or so. They would have the people to rig 3 huge buildings, and have all the explosive to do so. Then they would have to have the buildings vacated during this time because someone might accidentally see someone rigging the buildings. You have to have management involved to keep building security from doing their job. They would have to hire suicide pilots and someone to detonate the explosives. They would also have to have the time to do this all. Rigging building that size is not a simple task.
Large structures can take up to 3 MONTHS TO PREPARE!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_implosion
2007-08-29 03:52:56 · answer #3 · answered by The Skiier 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
About 10~15 people would have had to be involved.
5~10 could have set the charges at the WTC -- that's the normal size for a building demolition crew, and it would be easy to conceal the charges to that routine maintenance wouldn't find them quickly. And they only need to set and fire the charges -- everything else can happen without others' involvement.
And not more than 5 people would have been required to ensure access to the airplanes -- 1 person per airplane overseeing ticketing, plus one coordinator.
As for the Pentagon -- that's a separate issue that requires much greater analysis.
I don't think 9/11 was an inside job -- but it's not outside the realm of possibility.
2007-08-28 19:46:09 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The same number that were involved in burning down the Reichstag in Nazi Germany and blaming it on the Communists.
Pay people enough money and give them something to lose and they will keep their mouths shut.
2007-08-28 22:25:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
more than one
2007-08-28 20:36:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What.... It wasn't a conspiracy? Crap well there goes that book deal....guess I'll just work on the other book "foil hats for dummies"..... LMAO.... Good question and points, but "they" won't like this.....
2007-08-28 19:22:41 · answer #7 · answered by hardwoodrods 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
http://www.geocities.com/northstarzone/LIBERTY.html
Check some conspiracies from the past.
2007-08-28 19:48:38 · answer #8 · answered by xxxxx 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you really want an answer to your question??Watch the documentary"Zeitgeist"..It will answer all your questions...Find it online!!!!.....Be prepared for the answers !!!!You may not like them....!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-08-28 20:36:51 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋