If so, that means that they are all gay just like I thought.
2007-08-28 16:23:13 · 17 answers · asked by Torrey O 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Infidelity is the same for both parties. Of course they see it that way.
Romney isn't going to act like a democrat and come out against homosexuals because someone in his party was found out to be homosexual. For one thing, Romney probably doesn't care whos gay or not. He has his religion and he also reserves the right to allow others the right to make their own personal decisions about sex. I suspect he'd rather there was no gay people but that doesn't mean he is going to hold it against someone who is. That's not nice.
2007-08-28 16:28:18 · answer #1 · answered by eldude 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Mitt should stay out of this. Clinton stayed on one side of the fence. Craig not only crossed the line but in a restroom for Gods sakes.
2007-08-28 23:32:41 · answer #2 · answered by gc10k 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Um, they are both scandals that involved elected officials and suggestions of impropriety regarding sexual behavior. So I think it's a good comparison. The only difference is, Craig didn't do anything, and Clinton did pretty much everything.
2007-09-01 18:02:37 · answer #3 · answered by Belle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mitt Romney had to respond because Senator Craig was a member of his campaign staff; technically, his title was Senate Liaison. And he compared it to Bill Clinton because, while Clinton may not have done anything illegal, it was still immoral. Immorality is non-partisan; and no matter what your pastor tells you, it's certainly non-sectarian.
2007-08-29 00:22:08 · answer #4 · answered by Paper Mage 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not only gay, my friend. Think of the infidelities of those you don't hear about. The numbers on both sides of the aisle are horrendous. And not just the men, the women are worse than the men.
2007-08-29 00:42:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton is not a Greedy Ole Pedophile, GOP
2007-08-29 01:14:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, I believe Craig should resign, something Clinton never considered. But then no one ever said Clinton was an honorable man.
2007-08-29 00:08:50 · answer #7 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Can't you come up with a better insult than gay. Last time I heard Republicans are against gay people. Why would they be gay themselves. Unless they were complete hiprocrites like some of you democrats are.
2007-08-29 00:28:45 · answer #8 · answered by love_alw_693 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Only a Republican could manage to connect heterosexual oral sex with a closeted old fool cruising restrooms on the down low, in an attempt to deflect the attention from exactly where it belongs. We see that garbage in this forum every day.
2007-08-29 00:57:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Is Willard Mitt Romney that desperate for some votes.
Got to mud sling to make oneself look good.
2007-08-28 23:45:22 · answer #10 · answered by s l 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋