English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i mean anything remotely original.

2007-08-28 16:07:39 · 2 answers · asked by peter m 6 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

From my 2 answers so far,i see that both have a similarity-a similarity about
the time-the original time and an "out dated...time";
Now;i conjecture and therefore state
here that THIS is likely a feature of some sort of current education;i may be wrong but i'd say that this is a Reaction
against a mass darwinian-type education!
For,why should the question persuppose any time modulation?
i mean;the question is ABOUT SOMETHING "LEARNED"!
So have these two forgotten something?Or do they (covertly blame)
their teachers for either forgetting something /not remembering something.
Why then even "bring-up" the notion of time?
Personally,i think its high -time that we
get rid of our darwinist "hang-ups"
Please,learn to question what you have
been taught;most of it,the important bits as well,was completely accepted by
your teachers as,not god given,but as
Expert given(!)

2007-08-29 16:04:28 · update #1

2 answers

The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us; and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic

2007-08-28 16:20:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Of course, everything. That's because the books are not thousands of years outdated.

2007-08-28 23:43:40 · answer #2 · answered by phil8656 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers