We withdrawl from Iraq. Actually we run away with our tail between our legs. The Insurgents has just taken out the world best armed forces. What makes you think they won't come over here and take the war to our backyards?
2007-08-28 14:28:43 · 16 answers · asked by legendaryplanets 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey G or D
Dude the highjackers didn't have a navy or an army. The vietcong goal wasn't to ttake over the world and convert everyone to islam.
2007-08-28 14:34:52 · update #1
Im in the military anything else you damn liberals want to ask me!
2007-08-28 14:35:53 · update #2
It's pretty obvious just from reading these answers so far that most Americans are so spoiled and oblivious to real threats they'll just lay down and take the hammer to the forehead. Just like sheep.
They've never known what it's like to be unsure weather they'll live through the day.
We call them "food for the predators!!!"
Anybody remember the Eloy and the Morlocks???
2007-08-28 14:48:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Step 1 of Hillary's plan is "phased redeployment". This could mean anything from sending the troops somewhere else to cutting and running. Then there is Obama, who is for the plan of "Strategic Redeployment" which is a little more forthcoming. There is a lot of info on strategic redeployment. http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7BE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7D/redeployment.pdf
Bush's evangelist end of the world party has created quite a mess to clean up, but I think we can do it.
2007-08-28 14:48:27 · answer #2 · answered by ☺☻☺☻☺☻ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What if John Warner was president. Isn't he advocating the same thing? Or Chuck Hegel? By the way, those guys are Republicans
2007-08-28 14:33:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets not.
Most importantly, it is foolish to leave soldiers in a bad situation for the sake of pride versus the best strategy. War supporters attacked Iraq out of misrepresented fear. Now they are afraid to leave for the same reason.
2007-08-28 14:36:18 · answer #4 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the fact that they don't have a navy or an air force to do it...
basically... the same reason the vietcong didn't come after us after the Vietnam War over here...
they can walk to the ocean, but it's a long swim...
2007-08-28 14:33:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Some are already here. And if we don't close our borders, the ones that will cause the most damage will just walk across the Rio Grande.
2007-08-28 14:35:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
With what, row boats? Do you think they can really invade the US? How little faith you have in our fighting men and women. You should be ashamed. If we will seal up our borders, it would not be an issue at all.
2007-08-28 14:34:20 · answer #7 · answered by beren 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hillary isn't woman enough to be President.
2007-08-28 16:23:23 · answer #8 · answered by Gary 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't believe her bullshit. Even she's not stupid enough to pull out & make America look like wussies.
She doesn't have a prayer anyway, only half of the Dem's like her...no one else.
2007-08-28 14:35:37 · answer #9 · answered by BIKERSTAG 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
yeah, because we all know that the terrorists don't have access to maps or mapquest or a gps.
in order to find us, they will need to follow our troops home.
that's why we should stay in iraq - forever...
sound pretty stupid?
2007-08-28 14:35:29 · answer #10 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋