Not that I can recall. You have to remember liberal women eagerly ... you know.
2007-08-28 14:14:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
A prosecutor cannot clear someone of charges.
The prosecutor either files charges with the court, or does not. If charges are filed, the defendant either pleads guilty, or goes to trial. Only the trial court can clear someone of charges.
After a certain point (the statute of limitations) if charges have not been filed, then it's too late to do so.
2007-08-28 14:14:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was never formally charged with anything and there are serious questions related to Broderick's story, for example why did she wait 20 years to tell the story. Even the judge in the Paula Jones case said that case had no merit.
2007-08-28 14:18:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's a big difference between being charged and being convicted or pleading guilty. I'm sure glad I'm not a part of your justice system.
2007-08-28 14:14:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
no he was not. The only thing he got in trouble for is cheating on his wife. That person you are talking lied. She confessed to lying.
2007-08-28 14:14:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Were charges ever brought up against him? One has to have charges before any can be cleared.
You will believe just about any goldbricker won't you?
2007-08-28 14:14:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by beren 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
None that ever came forward.
2007-08-28 14:14:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
JJ's mom?
2007-08-28 14:19:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by nomames 4
·
0⤊
0⤋