When John Gibson claims that Hillary (whom I dislike) made a deal with Al-Q, does he lose credibility?

Question

Fox News' John Gibson: "Hillary makes a deal with Al Qaeda"
http://mediamatters.org/items/200708270007?f=i_latest

- PLAY GIBSON AUDIO CLIP ON RIGHT SIDE OF PAGE -

Suspended (below) Great spin! Of course, that conflicts with the FACTS spoken in Gibson's own words.

Answer 1

He can't lose something he never had.

Answer 2

When i first heard he comments I thought the same thing, Bush is all over AL qeuda, dems want to cut and run and Harry Reid says we already lost, If I was Osama i would wait and see if a Dem got elected and push him around like they did her old man. Should Bill Clinton have taken Osama Bin Laden into custody in 98 and 99, after 19 Airman Dead and 300 wounded in 96 at Khobar Towers yes!!! or the 2 U.S. Embassy Bombings in 98, yes, U.S.S. Cole, 9-11 took 6 years to plan, If i was Osama I 2 would want a dem in office so I could kick the U.S.'s A@@ again


What's funny is this a@@holes comments the very next day.

TEHRAN, Iran — President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned Tuesday that a power vacuum is imminent in Iraq and said that Iran was ready to help fill the gap.

"The political power of the occupiers is collapsing rapidly," Ahmadinejad said at a press conference in Tehran, referring to U.S. troops in Iraq. "Soon, we will see a huge power vacuum in the region. Of course, we are prepared to fill the gap, with the help of neighbors and regional friends like Saudi Arabia, and with the help of the Iraqi nation."

Although Ahmadinejad did not elaborate how Iran could fill a power gap, his bold remarks reflected what may be perceived as Iran's eagerness for an increasing role on its neighbor's political scene.

Earlier this month, during a visit here by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, Iranian leaders said that only a U.S. pullout would bring peace to Iraq and pledged their government would do its best to help stabilize the country.

Soon after al-Maliki's trip, the Iranian Foreign Ministry announced that Ahmadinejad had accepted an invitation to Baghdad by the Iraqi prime minister for a state visit. But the ministry added that a final decision on the trip had not been made.

Ahmadinejad accused the United States of interfering in Iraq's internal affairs, and dismissed U.S. criticism of al-Maliki's unsuccessful efforts to reconcile the country's Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds.

"They rudely say (the Iraqi) prime minister and the constitution must change," Ahmadinejad said. "Who are you? Who has given you the right" to ask for such a change, he added, addressing the U.S. critics of al-Maliki, who is also a Shiite.

Ahmadinejad dismissed the possibility of any U.S. military action against Iran.

"I tell you resolutely that there is no possibility, whatsoever, of such a decision in the U.S.," Ahmadinejad told reporters. "Even, if they were to decide to do so, they would be unable to carry it out."

U.S. has accused Iran of being behind attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq — a claim the Iraqi government has only partially backed, saying Iran could have a role in the attacks. Iran has denied the accusations.

Answer 3

No, it increases his ratings, because he's just telling the truth, but really no need in it, since everbody knows her evil agenda; her agenda says it all, just think about it ... If you were to send the message to Al Qaeda "Let's make a deal, If we leave Iraq, you leave us alone" You think AQ is going to listen????

Al Qeada isn't interested in diplomacy. Talking won't work, THEY WANT TO RULE THE WORLD!!

And Hillary knows this, but she does'nt care!!

Answer 4

In all fairness to Gibson, the insinuation is there. It's not comforting that she feels that she can send a message like that to al-Qaeda, nor is it comforting that she insinuates that her administration would not react to a terrorist attack by means of force.

Answer 5

well, it was more of a threat to Al Qaeda it sounds, but at the same time, the left generally believes that threatening terrorists doesn't really work, except make them more infuriated. So in that sense, she was. But I don't think she meant it in that way at all

EDIT: btw, has anyone else noticed that the guy above me "map" complains about stupid questions by answering them most of the time with dumb answers, or other questions with insulting answers, but never answers seriously?

EDIT2: I didn't spin it, i spoke it the exact way people who protest the Iraq war say it is. Am I wrong? doubt it.

Answer 6

Republicans are getting more desperate everyday and it shows!

I actually feel very bad for the moderate and sensible Republicans who have such repulsive leaders and talking heads to represent their party!!

The lower the discourse the worse off for the people of this country!

Answer 7

I don't think he lost his creditbility on that.

I dislike Hillary too. I could not deal with her being president at all.

Answer 8

That's assuming he had credibility to begin with, he didn't, so he had nothing to lose, so he can say the most insane things he wants.

Answer 9

Hillary would be the best friend that Al Qaeda could ever ask for.

She will be soft on terror.

Gibson was honest about that.

Answer 10

No - not at all!