I had Dish Network-- and THEY SUCKED!!!
Every time the wind blew the TV went out..... They were expensive, and had SERIOUSLY CRAPPY SERVICE!
If I had to pick between the two, I would have to go with Direct TV..... just because you would have to put some real effort into it if you were gonna be any worse than Dish Network!!!
2007-08-28 14:10:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by crankyissues 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
good now there are in basic terms approximately 10 HD channels with DTV different than for the HD locals for regardless of section you're in. In September the huge style will flow as much as 50 national HD channels, and by using the tip of the three hundred and sixty 5 days it truly is going to be over a hundred HD channels. There are 2 new satellites being released to handle. by using the way, the guy who published up above on the subject of the movies that are on Starz and the expenses to communicate to a guy or woman on the telephone is the two grossly at a loss for words or isn't an exceedingly trouble-free guy or woman, to place it properly.
2016-12-12 14:00:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
DirectTV
2007-08-28 14:11:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♥Pamela♥ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
DirectTV
2007-08-28 14:07:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by multipły 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
From what I've heard, DirectTV is better.
2007-08-28 14:08:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by HULK RULES!! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dish Network. It works well when it rains. The picture is very good.
2007-08-28 14:08:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by SandraD 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Dish network
2007-08-28 14:06:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Calif_Girl 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
dishnetwork, they have cheaper plans and i have a hd tv with a hd receiver so its awesome
2007-08-28 14:08:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Zo 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is good TV,there is better TV...then there is Direct TV ;)
2007-08-28 14:10:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by ɱýšƗȉɋǔȇ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
direct tv
2007-08-28 14:06:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jrizzle 3
·
0⤊
0⤋