Someone who is physically fit(muscleman)intelligent about a variety of subject matter,intuitive and a good musician.
2007-08-28 13:35:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Yes, there is. You've asked before and received proper answers.
2007-08-28 13:38:50 · answer #1 · answered by shmux 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Do you like to repeat questions?
It seems that you have double-posted a lot.
As for the answer you seek, physically fit does not necessarily mean a 'muscleman'...
He's an 'everyman' because every man has the potential to become this person if they so wish.
Your description is sadly lacking in other more important factors such as tolerance and compassion to name a few.
2007-08-29 00:11:52 · answer #2 · answered by Rob K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, there's a word alright, but you cannot use it on here. To tone it down a bit, such a person sounds like a total prat. No one is that talented and good looking at the same time. Experience tells me that extreme good looks and slenderness go hand in glove with high intelligence in both the male and the female.
Muscle bound freaks are only good for the football pitch or the gym and their brains are usually made of treacle as in thick. That's why we don't give sports scholarships to numb-sculls here in UK - thank God.
Look. I'm at the bottom of the heap right, a cleaner. But I want my country to be governed by well educated people, lawyers and so on not by nutters with big muscles. We've already got one of those and he's about the leave parliament after wasting every-ones time for the last 37 years. Apparently he wants to concentrate on his boxing career.
Clue to above = two jabs.
2007-08-29 00:37:46 · answer #3 · answered by Dragoner 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, unless you want to come up with something. The muscleman didn't really go with the other characteristics. But then the others don't form anything cohesive and definite either.
2007-08-28 20:42:25 · answer #4 · answered by Pansy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A 'renaissance man' ? Like President Theodore 'Teddy' Roosevelt?
2007-08-28 20:40:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jack.
He is a Jack of all trades and a master of none. Such people are often shallow. Stay away from them.They are flukers. They lack commitment.
2007-08-29 07:43:46 · answer #6 · answered by Almax 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since you ask this question several times per week under different Yahoo ID's, I would say the term is 'self-involved azzhole'.
2007-08-28 21:15:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to give him a term is to classify him -.- To classify him is to bring up prejudices. Even the characteristics you asked are classifing and prejudice. He might be a good musician to you, but to me he might be AWFUL! And it's not what you have, it's how you use it.
2007-08-28 21:03:56 · answer #8 · answered by lufiabuu 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A gentleman would be appropriate and well recognised in the past.
2007-08-29 11:07:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't try to put anyone into a particular box application forms have a knack of doing that for us
2007-08-29 07:19:34 · answer #10 · answered by tish the bi@ch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋