Well, it surely sounds as though he is preparing people for the eventual invasion of Iran. I read the speech, and saw part of it on TV. If it happens, I don't know where he'll get the warm bodies to invade, without a draft....and, just when they started to offer people twenty-grand to join. I hope I'm wrong in my supposition...I thought the man was nearly finished causing such trouble in our country. Is there no end to his idiocy?
2007-08-28 13:39:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by ArRo 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I hope not. Hey, you know what is going to happen to the nations that support terrorism as far as history is concerned?
LOL Congress pull the plug on funding, thats, well, been talked about for quite awhile now hasn't it. No reason they should do it now unless they feel the election is close enough that they can benefit from it.
2007-08-28 20:26:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by eldude 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The administration has simply no understanding of the middle east and the power politics at play there. It is time to stop playing gopher for the Saudis who if they are so concerned about Iranian influence should do something about it themselves, they have the influence and the money. . How many more lives are to be lost before this warmongering brinkmanship stops?
2007-08-28 20:36:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by janniel 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Don't worry about Iran. We can't beat Iraq. No way will the USA attack Iran. It just won't happen.
2007-08-29 00:11:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If Iran military personal are in Iraq then they are indeed in the wrong place. Iran needs to back the hell off.
2007-08-28 20:26:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Didn't seem to work for Truman when he killed 300,000+ civilians in 2 days.
2007-08-28 20:27:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Libsuc 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Congress is just about to pull the plug on Bush's purse strings.
2007-08-28 20:26:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Remember the GOP? 2
·
4⤊
3⤋
NEXT: Time to get them in line. seal the border
2007-08-28 20:27:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by bulletbob36 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, because by the time WW3 ends, there won't be many history books that would dare mention Bush's name.
2007-08-28 20:28:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
Depends on whose history book you are going to read! personally I feel he has over stepped his bounds!
2007-08-28 20:27:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by ben d 3
·
5⤊
3⤋