I have already been to the websites. At this point, I would have to vote Rudy. I do not trust the direction HC wants to go. I do not believe she is fiscally responsible, and she wants to expand government. I am just learning about Ron Paul, and do not have any where near enough info. Although I am still researching Rudy, (he is my current cand. research project), but agree with him in a number of areas and the areas where I disagree (so far) I can live with.
2007-08-28 11:39:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by halestrm 6
·
3⤊
6⤋
Sad to say, but it may come down to that (except Paul won't be in the mix). But, in the context of your question, there really isn't much of a choice. Hillary is a non-starter as far as I'm concerned. Eight years in the Senate and nothing to show for it. Rudy stands for nothing, except living on the past glory he achieved by being mayor when the WTC was attacked. What does this guy believe in, anyway?
I don't agree with Ron Paul on a lot of things, but I give him credit for his honesty and sincerity. It couldn't hurt to have some one running the country who actually wanted to the right thing and not just get elected. I'd hold my nose and vote for Ron.
2007-09-04 20:05:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe Ron Paul to be the best choice for America. He is the only experienced candidate that isn't part of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations). This organization is big business, big money and controls most media outlets. Instead do a search about them. To me it seems like they want to take our ever decreasing constitutional rights away and put in a dictator/puppet of their choice. Eventually they want a one world govt, controlled by them of course. America's military is their policy making attack dog, hence some of the past wars and current war, our lives = their profit. If he is not elected we may become the North American Union instead of the USA, have a big *** highway run through the country, and instead of the US dollar the Amero. There may be more consequences/theories but I'm too lazy to type. So don't take my word for it, do your own research. You can check his campaign website for his stance on issues. Also check out youtube for other info. CFR the real terrorist is a threat to our national security. Vote wisely. Good Luck
2007-09-02 23:34:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would easily vote for Ron Paul OR Rudy Giuliani over Hillary Clinton.
I am a Democrat, and am disgusted with the demeanor of Hillary. I would NEVER vote for her in the General election unless she has a damn good running-mate. She would be a horrible decision for the Democratic Party and the country. Clinton would divide us beyond all belief, not just the country but the Democratic Party too.
I will lose all faith in my party, along with many other Democrats, if she gets our nomination. To bring this country together we need change and bipartisanship. Barack Obama and Bill Richardson would be the only two to bring that change.
So back to my answer, out of those three I would vote for Ron Paul, and my second choice would be Giuliani.
We will see what happens, but I hope and pray Hillary doesn't get the Democratic nomination.
2007-08-28 12:51:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dr. Bradley 3
·
6⤊
4⤋
Ron Paul, of course. I think the nominee has already been decided, but hopefully, we can change that.
Miss Linner, FYI, that "hick from TX" is from Pennsylvania.
2007-09-02 11:59:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eyes 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
1st off, Paul won't be there! If he gets ANY delegates, I will be shocked! He can't even get higher than 3% in the legitimate national polls and he came in 5th in the Iowa straw poll - if you don't beleive me, check his website.
It will probably be Rudy & Hillary and I hope it will be Rudy. Actually, I like Fred but Rudy will probably get the nomination.
2007-08-31 17:52:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Rudi Giuliani, hands down. Hillary Clinton would destroy our Country. She has so many bad ideas and a spending agenda and health care plan that is nothing but trouble. As far as dealing with International affairs, I wouldn't trust her at all. She has proven that she is friendly with the enemies of our Country and has insulted many of our allies with some of her actions. She says she supports our military but, she has shown that she actually has no respect at all for them. Look up the facts. Rudy has some good experience handling difficult situations with the type of control and thought that would be good for the nation; he has proven that he could handle the job. He made many changes in NYC and made it a much safer place to live and visit. He is more moderate and sometimes, even a bit liberal for my tastes but, given the choice, I would choose him over Hillary any day. I am not as familiar with Ron Paul so I can only give a partial opinion. I like many of his ideas but would need to hear more before I totally made up my mind. He could be someone I would consider but, I need more facts. Rudy? I like many things about him and he would be one of the top choices for me. The Clintons were bad enough the first time around; I never want to have them in charge again.
2007-08-28 11:52:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by turkeybrooknj 7
·
4⤊
6⤋
Ron Paul because I don't wanna a President of the North American Union.
2007-08-28 14:16:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by jswnwv 3
·
8⤊
4⤋
Ralph Nader!
2007-08-30 06:55:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Clinton hands down...
2007-09-03 07:44:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jovesash 4
·
0⤊
1⤋