2007-08-28 11:10:31 · 15 answers · asked by Frankie 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Eat your pig, eat your chicken, eat your fish, eat your cow, eat your cat, eat your dog...yum, yum, yum.
I for one love barbecued dog. If you have never eaten barbecued Labradors, you are missing out. I had to go to Taiwan for that.
I think that Michael Vic's dogs should be roasted or barbecued and they should hold a big party. By the way, what is wrong with what Michael Vick did? It seems extremely hypocritical to charge him but let everyone in our food industry go free.
His dogs were treated no worse than the gazillion animals in America that are grown for food. What's the difference? And don't tell me that the difference is that his actions were illegal while the actions of the food industry are legal. We all know that. The question is an ethical one, not a legal one.
2007-08-28 17:26:37 · answer #1 · answered by http://www.wrightlawnv.com 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Shouldn't you wait for the sentence before asking this question? How could anyone who admits his guilt get a raw deal? Part of the plea was that they wouldn't bring other charges connected with the case against him and they are suggesting only 12-18 months as opposed to the max 5 years. So if anything he's getting the best deal any one who's done what he's done could hope for.
2007-08-28 11:54:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
so what if somebody else have been given away with homicide. that doesn't shrink what Vick did. thats retarded good judgment. in basic terms by way of fact the guy infront of you became into doing one hundred twenty five mph doe not imply the cop would desire to enable you circulate given which you have been caught doing ninety 5 mph vick finaced and participated interior the deaths of defensless animals. i won't fathom what sort of man or woman can %. up a canine and slam its physique to the floor or drops automobile battery cables into water to electocute a canine. or doused a canine in lighter fluid to burn it to dying!! hell if vick had the complication-loose decency to shoot the canines that could have shown some be apologetic approximately and would have been humane whilst in comparison with what he did. human beings save asserting he have been given a uncooked deal!! thats humorous! Vick purely have been given 18 months. that's not a severe penalty. the actuality he performs soccer has not something to do with it. 18 months isn't an prolonged time human beings!!
2016-10-17 05:34:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Put yourself in his situation without the fortune and fame and then ask yourself the question. I think if you compare the two the difference in time serve will be 2-3 times greater than whatever his sentence will be.
2007-08-28 11:37:12 · answer #4 · answered by Woody 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way.
He's getting a deal
at max 18 months and probation instead of 5 to 20 yrs if he got hit with racketeering charges.
2007-08-28 11:23:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yep thats all I think about poor Mike Vick.
2007-08-28 11:16:00 · answer #6 · answered by Matt G 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, Don Imus got a raw deal.
2007-08-28 12:04:14 · answer #7 · answered by Dude 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He plead guilty...How is he getting a raw deal when he hasn't been sentenced yet?
2007-08-28 11:15:14 · answer #8 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
how is he getting a raw deal?
he hasnt been scentanced yet.
he pleaded guitly, and even though yeah, he is famous and all, he still deserves whatever he gets. celebrities are people too. the same laws that apply to us, apply to them.
2007-08-28 11:18:48 · answer #9 · answered by Ashley M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no... I mean his "friends" shouldn't have agreed to testify against him to save their own arses! Thats the only raw deal he has gotten... He deserves what he is getting for what he did...
2007-08-28 11:14:57 · answer #10 · answered by shaggy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋