they are all too dumb
2007-08-28 10:33:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The printed transcript from audio recordings of the arrest interview DOES suggest that a surprised and embarrassed Craig was railroaded by insistent cops--who may well have been on a pay-ola payroll from Craig's enemies.
Bear in mind: todays D.C. politics is much more nastier than in Craig's prime younger days--and the man simply hasn't caught on to the new political dynamics. Craig is a product of 'old school' D.C. politics, where empowered were given degrees of discreet respect by law enforcement; albeit so true such a courtesy was (and still is) abused by guilty persons of political affluence and persuasion.
Craig should have exercised his Miranda right to remain silent until conferring with his attorney(s) with the matter.
Interesting how now, police are going into a different direction--accusing Craig of lying to police.
Albeit true Craig did legally plead guilty to this offense, the light of the printed transcript now sheds a new light on the matter that makes the game interesting; done right--Craig stands to secure a major courtroom victory.
2007-08-30 20:18:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. Wizard 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can you say that? Look at the Senate, now and in the past, and ask yourself if stupidity has ever been a prohibitive characteristic for either party?
While there have been a majority of smart and principled men and women over time, both the Senate and the House have attracted an astonishing collection of shrewd but truly ignorant cynics. Consider Joe McCarthy.
Now, Joe McCarthy might be the most despicable, but he has had competition from both left and right. The Republicans of today may look to be as immoral and cynical as any previous group, but that is only because they have been wrapped in the flag and screaming damnation at others for so long.
Craig is not stupid, merely weak and dishonest. It is those who supported him in his crusade when they knew he was an apostate who must be questioned, just as we should ask why Tom Delay got a free ride for so long. It sure puts Bill Clinton's oral sex in a new light. Those boys must have been angry because it wasn't them in the blue dress!
2007-08-28 17:44:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Exactly. And he isn't. He pled guilty to try to prevent it from hitting the press too hard. Now that it is obvious that he failed at that, he's pretending he didn't know he had the right to an attorney.
Since he is a member of the United States Senate, it's really hard to believe he didn't know he was entitled to representation.
He's just playing the old game: Deny, deny, deny. Or, in his case... Admit, deny, deny.
2007-08-28 17:36:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The fact that he plead guilty says alot about the voracity of the charges.
If good judgment is an indication of intelligence, his poor judgment certainly raises doubts of his intelligence.
2007-08-28 17:35:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
and W is a genius?
10) "Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream." —LaCrosse, Wis., Oct. 18, 2000
9) "I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." —Greater Nashua, N.H., Jan. 27, 2000
8) "I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004
7) "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." —Saginaw, Mich., Sept. 29, 2000
6) "You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb.
5) "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004
4) "They misunderestimated me." —Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000
3) "Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?" —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000
2) "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
1) "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
2007-08-28 17:35:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Nope not with 27 years of experience in legislation. He is no rookie he knew what he was doing.
2007-08-28 17:37:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by babygurl 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
of course not. If you believe all the right tells you than the Iraq war is going well, the economy is fantastic, and we have no domestic problems that are all that important.
2007-08-28 17:34:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Since Bush has been president, nobody can truly be called "too stupid" for ANY government position.
2007-08-28 17:33:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by obl_alive_and_well 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bushdeathgrip had me laffing my **** off. That is good.
And yes, he IS too stupid to be in gov't at all.
2007-08-28 17:44:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by PATRICIA MS 6
·
0⤊
0⤋