He will fit EQUALLY, no more or no less, as it should be.
2007-08-28 09:25:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Not so looney afterall 5
·
13⤊
5⤋
I think you can pretty much stop with the first part of your question, 'In the Democratic vision of the future'. As this past election so clearly demonstrated, they have no vision of the future. That's been sort of the point. They've painted themselves so tightly into the liberal corner that if they did articulate any sort of vision for the future, it would be dictated to them by moveon.org and who's going to vote for that? A couple of hairy women and a guy with head lice?
2007-08-28 09:33:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
One disadvantage of living in a pluralistic society is that certain groups lose rights. If white heterosexuals become a minority, Democrats, with their superior track record of protecting minority rights, are more likely to stand up for white males.
2007-08-30 00:59:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know about you but as a white heterosexual male adult I don't plan on doing anything differently than I have been. Why would my role change unless I want it to? Since I don't want it to it shall remanin pretty much the same as it is today.
2007-08-28 10:25:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Everything is politics these days, so I guess it all depends on which way you lean, but society overall has become so indulged in sex and pornography, and other wordly pleasures such as Sports, Material pleasures, Computers, All the new products coming out in stores, Vehicles (all the new designs colors and stylishness of them) etc,etc,etc,etc. that it has corrupted our only firm Foundation for a better society.
Such as William Bennett writes -- "We have witnessed a profound shift in public attitudes. We Americans now place less value on what we owe others as a matter of moral obligation; less value on sacrifice as a moral good, on social conformity, respectability, and observing the rules; less value on correctness and restraint in matters of physical pleasure and sexuality----and correlatively greater value on things like self-expression, individualism, self-realization, and personal choice."
Ah, there's that nasty, nasty little word "choice."
So you see, it's hard to place the white heterosexual male in society, because public opinion has become so indoctrinated with the Liberalism of todays culture, I can only assume it does not look good, because society continues to embrace those of the abnormal lifestyle such as the Homosexuals - (Sodomites).
The Liberal schools and colleges are teaching them that it is "ok" to be attracted to the same sex, and do ecstasy at the same time; and this my friend is the darkness that is Liberalism in its modern day dilemma of so called "equality" make no mistake, there can be no question about this debilitating and vile culture of disease, of degenerating society, that will lead to the downfall of American Life, Liberty and Happiness!!!
I will say this, heterosexuality is biblical terminology, and those who remain in this are making Sound judgement on their part, and when they turn from the biblical teaching, they are turning away from their only source of hope for another tomorrow.
A NATION'S MORAL LIFE IS THE FOUNDATION OF ITS CULTURE!!
And where might the Moral Life stand? It rests on the Word of Almighty God.
So, what will determine the future of America will be in which direction they choose to take, they can choose to turn from sin and serve Almighty God and put Him first, and expect to be blessed, Or, they can continue to embrace the sin sick lifestyle in the lusts of the world as the current state of America is, and sink America ultimately into a pit of despair.
I would say to America -- 'Do not tempt God' because He cannot look upon sin, He loves you, but you must be willing to serve Him first and then you will have True peace that passeth all understanding, we must lay worries on Him, and Him alone.
God bless!
Pray for America!!
JR
2007-08-28 10:05:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The same place as everyone else?
Why do you feel the white heterosexual adult male needs a special place to fit in?
2007-08-28 09:25:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Adam B 1
·
7⤊
3⤋
As the one to blame for all that is wrong with the world. As the foil for democrats race baiting tactics.
2007-08-31 15:17:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I realize that, because white heterosexual males have been in control through so many millennia of history, it *feels* like a demotion to have everyone equal, with equal responsibilities AND equal decision-making power. But you'll get used to it.
2007-08-28 09:30:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
He should fit in right next to everyone else. Why, does a white, heterosexual adult male need special treatment?
2007-08-28 09:26:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
If he's a white Con one would have to question the heterosexual part. They have a somewhat unique way of fitting in with the boys.
2007-08-28 09:27:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Judging by the stage at the debates, they appear to fit in quite nicely. They don't seem to be excluded from becoming the presidential nominee.
The real question is where does anyone else fit within the GOP vision? Is it in the same place that they fit within the GOP primary presidential candidates?
How is it within the melting pot that is America, there haven't been any new "ingredients" added to the GOP? When will they let the 50s go?
- "Stepford wives. More than just a movie. Vote GOP" -
2007-08-28 09:25:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
6⤊
5⤋