English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

On the Republican side, Mitt Romney is the most qualified candidate to become the next U.S. President. In the Democratic side, on the other hand, Bill Richardson is the most qualified as well. I reside in Florida where its a closed primary state and as a Democrat I'll cast my vote for Bill Richardson. However, if Romney wins the Republican nomination, I'll vote for him in the general elections.

2007-08-28 07:42:58 · answer #1 · answered by Maria Gallercia 4 · 0 5

If, by qualified, you mean a flip-flopping, practicing mormon who won't even back his own state's universal health care and has to spend gobs of money to bus in retarded people and nursing home residents to vote for him in the Iowa straw poll, then sure I guess he's qualified.

It doesnt seem like qualifications really matter these days anyway since the "top tier" candidates are either inexperienced and fake (Obama), the worst first lady in recent history (how can Hillary be a good president when she was a sucky first lady!? My how soon we forget), a TV actor who violates election laws, steals other candidates views, and hasnt been in politics for 4 years (Fraud err Fred Thompson), a mayor who has never done anything other than be in the right place at the right time (Giuliani...how does being a mayor qualify you to run a country?!), etc. This election is shaping up as one of the worst in history.

2007-08-28 08:33:41 · answer #2 · answered by crucial_master 3 · 2 1

interior the frequently used i will vote for Rudy, yet whilst Mitt is the "R" candidate i will very truthfully vote for him he's a sturdy Capitalist. He has fastened company and grew to alter into regularly occurring for fixing company -- lots so as that when the 2002 iciness Olympics became into in situation Mitt got here in and made it a innovations-blowing adventure. He has government journey -- Gov. of Liberal Mass. Did an ok activity -- yet made compromises i does not choose. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that -- he did not compromise on his morals whilst exceeded a bill authorizing money for fetal analyze and he had to veto this even nonetheless his earlier place became into to not oppose any abortion law (that's comfortable with the LDS faith-- one is to not inspire abortions, yet that doesn't recommend we can't vote for decision for the duration of this form). So i'm comfortable with Mitt D

2016-10-17 05:18:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think he's qualified but too many people will not vote fro him just because he's Mormon. At least he doesn't have a pile of baggage in his closet like most of the others.

2007-08-31 17:44:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In terms of experience? Toss up - Romney / Richardson. In terms of having it right on the objective issues (economy / taxes)? Yes, Romney is the most qualified.

2007-08-28 07:22:44 · answer #5 · answered by truthisback 3 · 0 2

Way too early to tell. He does share a lot of my Conservative values (except religion), however if the election was today and if I was in the United States, I'd vote for Ron Paul or Rudy Giuliani in the Republican Party.

2007-08-28 07:22:27 · answer #6 · answered by Austrian Theorist 4 · 1 1

Who really knows who the most qualified is?

2007-08-31 20:25:45 · answer #7 · answered by CreoleSista 3 · 0 0

Only one who truly understands Money. Our money.
Even when it is not his.
He operated successful businesses.

What in h does Clinton understand about money?
Pres. Clinton never held a job or paid a morgtage in his life.
From graduation on, he lived with his mother, then the State Capitol, and then the White House.
Now he lives in a million dollar mansion which is no doubt paid for with speeches for multi thousands and pension.

If she is elected, TWO pensions? For God's sake.
How can they live on those paltry amounts?

2007-08-28 07:31:29 · answer #8 · answered by ed 7 · 0 1

Any man who takes the dog on a family vacation riding in a cage on the top of his car, needs a self examination into the lack of qualifications this behavior displays for ANY political office, except DOG CATCHER!

2007-08-28 08:31:40 · answer #9 · answered by Bambi 5 · 4 1

You mean the same Mitt Romney who bribed the international olympic committee to get the SLC games?

2007-08-28 07:35:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers