They were talking about things that are ghetto on a radio talk show this morning and they said toliet seat covers are...the ones that match the rest of the bathroom.
Just wondering people's opinions.
2007-08-28 07:08:30 · 5 answers · asked by <3 FLYERS <3 2 in Home & Garden ➔ Other - Home & Garden
If you are talking about the fuzzy things that usually have matching tank covers and little rugs that go in front of the toilet, I don't think they are Ghetto per se but they DO remind me a lot of my grandmother and old aunts. The only times I have seen them in someone's house have been in old(er) folks' bathrooms.
2007-08-28 07:17:45 · answer #1 · answered by Will Y 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I certainly don't think they're ghetto....I think they're sanitary as hell. Ghetto would be stealing the ones from the public bathrooms to use at home.
2007-08-28 14:16:25 · answer #2 · answered by JAS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't have any particular opinion about them one way or another; i never thought they were ghetto. it probably depends if you keep yours nice and clean and new looking or let it get ratty. personally i don't like them because they sometimes make it hard to keep the toilet seat up. but i don't think it's a big deal to have them.
2007-08-28 14:16:10 · answer #3 · answered by KJC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only are they ghetto, they're even MORE ghetto when they don't match! And JAS, y'all missed da point: we b'es talkin'
bout them fuzzy wuns, not dem papuh wunz.
2007-08-28 14:31:48 · answer #4 · answered by Dept. of Redundancy Department 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't call them "ghetto"...more like tacky
2007-08-28 14:16:16 · answer #5 · answered by noelbutterfly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋