English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Horror, sadness, fear..and anger that none of the dems or libs would take it seriously..And resignation to the fact that they will STILL find a way to blame Bush...

2007-08-28 07:08:02 · answer #1 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2 2

I'd think that bush had been "president" for eight years PRECEDING Hillary's presidency -- and is therefore responsible.


After all, HE is the one who CREATED the whole "war on terror" right? Therefore, with all the BILLIONS upon BILLIONS thrown at Homeland Security, with the totalitarian combining of government agencies, with all the Constitutionally-guaranteed rights of Americans in shreds (in order to spy on "terrorists" right?), with all the law enforcement agencies gone berzerk-o militaristic - we would have SURELY thwarted the PLANNING which would necessarily have to occur for said attack to take place....with all of these things destroying this country since 911 and for there to STILL be an "attack" on America by terrorists....well then....

bush just didn't do his job, did he?

It will be bush's fault. For sure.

2007-08-28 14:08:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Nuked by whom? The terrorists who destroyed the twin towers didn't have conventional weapons, they used planes.

Also for all the hoopla surrounding the Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, they have yet to be found.

And before you say they were moved to Syria, how was it that Colin Powell could find mobile weapon trucks from sattelite photos yet couldn't use those same sattelites to track weapons transported to Syria?

2007-08-28 14:08:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Good riddance to bad trash. Destroy the "Liberal Media" and "The Beltway" and all the evils they foist on us hard working Americans in one neat, clean surgical strike! Well Done USAF!

2007-08-28 14:15:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Assuming that Hilary knew about it ahead of time and threw bill off her in time to escape, i would simply grab a semi-auto assault rifle....
From then on, hilary would rue the day she couldn't ban automatic weapons...

I apoligise for how graphic my description is...

2007-08-28 14:09:45 · answer #5 · answered by Conservative 1st, patriot 2nd 3 · 4 1

I would blame the previous president the way the cons try to do for 9/11.

2007-08-28 14:08:47 · answer #6 · answered by Raven 5 · 2 3

It'll be a reaction of non-surprise.

2007-08-28 14:14:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Shock and sadness for all the families of those lives lost.

I'm not stupid enough to think enormous, terrible things like that have anything to do with the political party of the particular president in office.

2007-08-28 14:05:31 · answer #8 · answered by Buying is Voting 7 · 2 4

i'd be dead first off since i live 30 miles away from the center of manhattan but if i was alive i would tell all my fellow NY residents I TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!!!

2007-08-28 14:09:32 · answer #9 · answered by trendkill_17 2 · 3 1

The same as if it happened under any other Presidency.

2007-08-28 14:09:19 · answer #10 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers