* Richard Clark
* Colin Powel
* Mike Brown
* Scott McClellen
* Donald Rumsfeld
* Karl Rove
* 8 Federal Prosecutors
* Anthony Gonzales
(did I miss any?)
2007-08-28 05:01:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The easy...Answer: Bill had Janet Reno fire ...93...Federal Prosecutors in one fell swoop! He also majorly re-vamped his second term staff. But since YOU are counting prosecutors I believe that I have named a president with more staff changes.
2007-08-28 05:29:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, Clinton had more turnover, and more indictments too...
Secretary of State: Warren Christopher
Secretaries of the Treasury: Lloyd Bentsen, Robert Rubin
Secretaries of Defense: Les Aspin, William Perry
Secretary of Agriculture: Mike Espy
Secretaries of Commerce: Ronald H. Brown, Mickey Kantor, William M. Daley
Secretary of Labor: Robert Reich
Secretary of Housing and urban Development: Henry G. Cisneros
Secretary of Transportation: Federico F. Pena
Secretaries of Energy: Hazel R. O’Leary, Frederico F. Pena
Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs: Jesse Brown
93 Federal Prosecutors
2007-08-28 12:06:36 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 11⤊ 1⤋
You haven't been paying attention, have you? Almost every president recycles their entire staff at some point during their time in office. And you forgot Andy Card in your list. If you think 8 federal prosecutors is a big deal, then know that Clinton replaced all 93.
2007-08-28 12:06:58 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Lincoln, he had to replace most of his cabinet and several Army commanders. Perhaps you should do some research before asking stupid questions. Oh and Clinton has Bush beat when he replaced all 93 federal prosecutors.
2007-09-05 00:01:44 · answer #4 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The amount of changes in this administration is not normal, perhaps in the Nixon administration maybe but I would challenge anyone to back up that this is normal.
I thinkone of the big differences betweenthe Bush and Clinto administrations regarding scandal was that menwho worked Clinton had scandals with womenwhile republicans under bush have scandals with men and boys.
2007-08-28 12:14:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I can't answer your question, but I can direct you to some good background on what's going on here.
Go to msnbc.msn.com and to the list of "politics" stories. Click on the story, "Does Bush Have Any Friends Left?"
There is a discussion of the fact that Bush is definitely running very low on candidates for Gonzalez' replacement. The reason: few people are going to put their careers on the line to go to Washington and be yes-men to this muddle-headed, failed drug addict.
Not even his private-school chums.
2007-08-29 07:15:04 · answer #6 · answered by Raven 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Honestly, this is normal for a two-term president. If you go that far below the Cabinet level, you'll find a similar number of staff changes by Clinton and Reagan.
2007-08-28 12:06:11 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas M 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It's the norm for the presidential staff to keep changing. Bush is far from having the most.
2007-08-28 12:09:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Snow's gone too.
I'm willing to bet the Nixon administration had more turnover- they lost both a VP and a Pres!
2007-08-28 12:17:48 · answer #9 · answered by Beardog 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton hands down!
Don't forget that pesky impeachment..Oh yeah Monica-gate.
2007-09-04 00:49:52 · answer #10 · answered by ak6702 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋