fire covers the worls and then all the humans and animals aare all stuk on the only little islands that arnt ablaze(ie.england.scotland.some greek islands) and then we are all eating eachother humans and animals alike coz there is no food and then a tidal wave sweeps over the whole world so then we get half burnt to beath and then drowned...
2007-08-28 04:40:34 · 7 answers · asked by lila...x 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Having a negative time event make you relive all of history backwards in a continuous loop. Except all of humanity is stuck in a room with a giant TV monitor playing American Idol reruns, and there is no way out, just watching Simon, Paula, and Randy backwards for eternity.
2007-08-28 04:50:40 · answer #1 · answered by Aaron S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anything that's slow and agonizing...such the effect of global impact winter after a full scale nuclear exchange. The world will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity before everyone eventually dies.
2007-08-28 12:41:33 · answer #2 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, the worst way for me would be to be the last to die. To watch loved ones perish while I still live. And to know that I will be truly alone at some given point (since I'd be the last one to die).
2007-08-28 12:27:24 · answer #3 · answered by jah_ras66 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is P & S masquerading as philosophy?
If it's going to come near to the worst death possible!you need to work in something that leaves you in constant agonising pain, like poisioned air dissolving your skin.
2007-08-28 12:07:47 · answer #4 · answered by . 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Die unloved.
2007-08-29 03:43:12 · answer #5 · answered by Tuna-San 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You said it. Death in fire would be the worstest.
Either fires, or a supernova explosion...that would probably be the worstest.
2007-08-28 11:49:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
so you answered your own question? what's the point?
2007-08-28 11:47:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋